Saint86

More importantly. Within a week of finally shipping out lemina... And academy product the les Reed era released for free sells for £50m. And yet people blame our current owner 😅

Probably one of your last visits to St Mary's so enjoy it. Maybe leave a little "an unvaccinated was 'ere" sticker on the seat / row 🤭

Not sure there was much code about it... although, you have to hope we'd get some right back cover?

I could see him at Chelsea tbh. Tammy leaving, haaland by no means a cert... And... Well... Fuck me how do you put this... Werner 😱 Chelsea are buying a striker this window 😅

Exactly this. He could very well just be looking after himself by keeping his options open for a dream move to a bigger club and top level football.... Which is fair enough given his ability level, age, and injury record... and with a world cup next year after missing the squad this summer. Think some of our fans need to get their heads screwed on when they're wishing he'd leave etc. If he stays and signs a new contract thats great. The guy would have won golden boot 2 seasons ago if he'd taken a few penalties, as it is he missed out on it by 1 goal to a guy who did score several penalties. If he runs his contract down or ends up leaving saints for a comparable wage and a team like west ham/Everton/arsenal/spurs, then yean, looks like an almost sideways move and he just wants the money. But if he goes to a champions league team then do our fan's really blame him? At the moment its too early to tell which scenario is true so you have to wait and see. I don't think he'll run his contract down anyway. If he has any desire to go to the world cup then he needs a great season, and he'll only get that being the main man in an attack and giving his all - the last thing he'll want is another extended period on the side-lines at this stage in his career (with his injury record) and no long term security.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-9833975/Leicester-City-announce-plans-add-8-000-seats-King-Power-Stadium.html If you want to visualise and experience an expanded St Mary's, soon you'll be able to an King Power to do it. All you'll need is some rose tinted glasses and you'll get an almost perfect look and feel.

He looks to have been the main keeper in the pre season friendlies? Certainly seen him making a fair few saves - but that could just be that we defend worse with him in goal 😆

Get ready for another season of Yolo Ralphampton FC 🤷‍♂️ I'm actually really excited to see Tella get more game time this year. And i think with a fit Romeu and Perraud joining, our first 11 looks much more balanced and more dangerous than it did for most of last season. A lot will hinge on whether Ings goes, and how interested he is if he stays.

I think you'll find that the sentiment of that statement is utter tosh. Until they do something meaningful that surpasses our recent achievements they remain fair game in my most humble opinion. We beat them in the championship, have been to Wembley more than them since our return, and they haven't bettered our league finish under Koeman despite being on a far better footing. In the trials and tribulations of medium sized clubs that don't win anything and have nothing better to do, West Ham are absolutely fair game 🥳... We even took the gloss off their Payet season 😆. Who cares if we actually beat them every season 🙄

We are sure as hell not bidding £30m 😆

Personally don't see the issue with this. Not all experience has to be of top level success. Look's like he's been hired as he knows the club, can help prepare those players for what they'll experience in trying to break into senior teams (the pitfalls along the way), and help prepare those who don't make it.

They're a forum moderator. They live for stuff like this 😆

Sigh.

This is fair 😂

What's the away shirt?

Well not for Tottenham no... And its not like city don't have a plethora of attacking players - i'm sure they'll manage 😆

I see similar arguments made to justify the introduction of these passports a lot. Firstly, an international travel passport is not the same as a passport to go to your local football ground. Secondly, Covid has an average mortality rate of circa 0.02% and diminishes with age. Comparatively Plague and Yellow fever have infection mortality rates in the region of 50%-70% even with today's medicine 🤷‍♂️. There is no comparison to be made severity wise. Take Measles as another example, comparable mortality rate to covid and more infectious... but no vaccine passports 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, i stand by the moral standpoint that they shouldn't be introduced.

Are they meant to be discriminatory? I thought they were meant to be an effective way to control the virus at large venues and make them safe 🙄? Genuinely scary how quickly some people have adopted this mindset. The inarguably safe way for large venues to be open is through testing, and only through testing. I didn't state vaccines weren't worth having, i said i was against vaccine passports. Also the 88% effectiveness against hospitalisation is another figure that is worsening with time. Its an interesting one, how low will that figure get before people are no longer happy to go to a football stadium with tens of thousands of other fans who all think there is no risk of them transmitting covid and that they all have a safe level of protection? Say 60k fans with a 50% reduction in transmission rate and an 80% effectiveness against hospitalisation? Or, negative test results prior to entry?

Well I mean, it includes asymptomatic transmission 🤷‍♂️. Also, the previous figures were a 64% effectiveness at reducing transmission. Whilst those latest figures are a 39% at preventing infection. I don't care overly about the nuance of the comparative wording given something like 80% of covid cases are asymptomatic and its highly transmissible. My point is. Vaccine passports are flawed and are discriminatory. If you want to ensure safety at these events, then for me, the only safe and non discriminatory route is testing prior to entry.

Sorry Whitey, your're right to question that number. When i looked last week Israel was reporting 64% protection. Sadly its dropped to 39% on latest evidence. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/23/delta-variant-pfizer-covid-vaccine-39percent-effective-in-israel-prevents-severe-illness.html Looks like I inadvertently made my point incorrectly weighted towards the vaccine passport side!!! 🙃

I'd actually not seen that. So there has been parliamentary debate which invalidates one of my above points. Boris and co are just going to ride rough shod over the outcome no doubt still citing the same emergency powers that they're using to try to ban protests and silence journalists then? Not to mention ignoring businesses.

To me its irrelevant whether you support vaccines or not. The bigger issue is the very slippery slope of adopting any form of passport to society and a system that will become an effective digital ID card. Fundamental points here (as i see it) is that covid has a survivability rate of 99.98%, the most vulnerable have been double vaccinated, 90% have had at least 1 jab, and people are entirely ignoring natural immunity in these debates. Against that we see a very one sided push for these passports from certain sectors despite any reasonable scientific debate or even a political debate in this country. I don't see an winning argument for adopting such an autocratic system that infringes on liberal freedoms. It is fundamentally the segregation of elements of society that don't tow the line - and even if that isn't you personally, surely that is going to include family members, friends, colleagues etc. I am sure we all (or at least a lot of us) know someone in this bracket? What will be next for them? As a society are we going to ban them from all forms of public entertainment? From working? Leisure centres/activities? Already people are having their education opportunities jeopardized. Are we just going to slowly ostracise them and turn them into pariahs because they're fundamentally acting out of concern for their health and what they put in their bodies? Its also fairly irrelevant to the transmission of covid. In a 32k crowd thats 90% vaccinated with a vaccine that only has a circa 60% protection against asymptomatic transmission (and falling), who is going to care about the 3200 who may be unvaccinated (but for damn sure will get immunity the other way) vs the 17,000 who could pass it asymptomatically despite being vaccinated? The only way you deal with this issue is a robust system to show proof of a negative test, and its also a lot fairer and more in line with a free society. There is also an argument to say that the youngest and least at risk should be encouraged to get a broad spectrum natural immunity to covid whilst the vulnerable are most protected by the vaccines - but that is an entirely separate debate). You also have the glaring issue in football that children won't be vaccinated and are therefore in line to be excluded from football presumably? Along with those who can't receive the vaccines or those that have had bad reactions to the vaccines. These people will form a significant part of a football club's fanbase / future fanbase. Its a no to vaccine passports from me at anyrate.

We're not selling either of our keepers surely? Why the hell did we sell gun in a cut price deal if that was the case.

I think Villa face an ffp fine when they get relegated. But yeah, if they don't sell grealish it doesn't really add up for me.

Brentford's recruitment setup has been superb for years. To my mind, they are where they are due to player trading.