Olallana

And when we are aiming for 12th spot we get rid of the whole team and buy players suited for that. And year after that when we aim for 10th we of course go out and buy a new team for that. And when we are aiming for 8th we.....yeah, you can probably guess this one....

What? Where have you been the last two months? Unless you are regarding QPR as the best of course...

To be fair, they talked about us and West Ham and ours total spending together, compared to Reading that also was promoted...

2014/15.

Nice one....

When do you think the first MP Out thread was on this board?

Did you predict 4 points from 10 first games followed by some howlers from a young keeper? If so, I´m impressed....

Or Claudio Caniggia??

Agree. I also think Adrian Lopez fits in that mould, maybe Lens. We definitely needs a new CB, preferably a first choice CB, like Astori. Hooiveld will need to be replaced and I think Fonte has perhaps only another year with us, maybe two. (not speaking of contract, it´s about ability to stay in the team on quality)

I just dont understand why players are judged the first year on the whole transfer fee? People say we have not got value for 11.8m this year regarding Ramirez. Ok, so next year he should be judged for costing nothing? For me it´s transfer fee split with amount of years on contract. If he leaves earlier you make the judgement in retrospect depending of transfer fee in minus transfer fee out, split with the years he´s been at the club. That´s the most fair judgement in what value for money a player is IMO.

Who would you prefer people? Sinclair or Lens? Probably around the same amount of money for both of them in term of transfer fees and wages. Lens football-wise for me, but not to sure about his mentality...

Funny thing during that JPT. In the press conference after the game.....what can is on the table next to the Wrexham manager... and who is the main sponsor? https://twitter.com/ErikNiva/status/315923593336860672/photo/1/large

Yep, but not so much by choice I think. The way we lost our 2 goal-lead against Stroke might been a blessing in disguise cause it forced NA to play Boruc again.

Stig Johansen is another I recall.....the 6th though....

He might have been "advised" by NA or the club to keep silent about it.....and when investigating could not find the evidence to take it further it was dropped....

I´m flattered, you think he was talking about me.....getting a bit obsessed there, aren´t you? Seeing things that are not there etc...

Yep, I really need to do that, don´t I? You´re funny.....in the most embarrassing way that is.....

Haha, unfortunately he has a lot of troll friends/family here.

Yep. Terrible to only win 49% of the games as a football team. In PL this year 4 teams are better than that so far. The rest of the teams must be utter garbage..... http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/tables

To be more precise, 49%. Teams with less shots win 22%. Make your choice, keep looking stupid. Over and out.

Yes and you have had several chances to see that the team with less shots win 22% of the games. Is that better to you? Final question, I wont bother anymore after this. But, I dont expect an answer cause you never answer questions you get when you know that you are out in deep water....

I will. Funny though that a win ratio of 22% is better than 49%.

Actually I was kind enough to match it against Adkins last 9 games (as some would say....FACT)..... Still same results. But you are saying that I cant measure things over 6 games, but OP could...? Sounds a bit unfair..... Possession stats dont say a thing. You can pass it around in the back four for 70%, wont give you success. Chances created....pretty much same things as shots stat-wise and I also used those words (creating chances) in my post..... http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?43615-Team-playing-well-under-Pochettino-MYTH&highlight=MYTH post #28, really backtracking and changing my arguement........

No, but as he said, in the premier. Or are you the god almighty interpreter of what people are saying here so you can twist it to your own advantage?

So I guess you will come out now and say that we ARE playing better? 9 points out of 8 games is for sure better than 22 points from 22 games.....dont you think? And as always you are saying things that isn´t true. You will not find ONE post from me saying points don´t matter. But if the view as OP said is about playing (as in not looking at results) ,we have been playing much better under MP. Points are important, but I have only talked about "in the long run", surely that could not have escaped you....