Olallana

Grant Holts view on Lambert in the national team. Makes a bit of sense for once... http://www.sportinglife.com/football/premier-league/news/article/312/8606533/holt-bugged-by-england-snub

Considering our defending on set pieces at times I for one think it´s good that we dont give away a lot of unnecessary freekicks from midfield... And what is "scrap and fight" if not winning a lot of tackles, and having a lot of interceptions?

Punch?

Wouldn´t swap all five against one of ours

Shoud we call you Sanchez from now on then on this forum?

Could at least put some more reasonable names of players that we might have been able to buy in the summer if you are going to complain that we didn´t buy that type of player but went for Ramirez instead.....??

Noone? Just sitting here stating some FACTS for people that might misinterpret what other people are saying....

Players in the 21-man matchday squad will never play a game night before matchday.

I think it´s okey for everybody that people state their opinion. But when it´s in many posts has to be followed by talks of "hairdresser", "girl" etc, that´s when it gets ridicolous and moronic.

So you are saying that Pahars was aslo rubbish then?

So every goal from now on is for free?

It´s not always the goals that catches the eye. The nutmeg and shot against Fulham away was the type of brilliance our club has lacked since MLT days.

Mila Kunis? Let me be first to say it... Such Dell size mentality....

Loads of details but still they missed to mention that he won a penalty for us against Villa....

Even though it ends well I hope they are wrong during the way. Imagine this board after week 37....

True but we have very low value in the depth of our squad because we have come from lower divisions. Stoke has been in PL all the time and still have very low sell figures. I think that when our squad is transformed to more of a PL squad our net spend will be lower, but only time will tell.

Agree but in their case it´s more a business plan to win trophies and at least Chelsea and City has achieved that the last few years. Liverpool hasn´t but I think their spending is because of pressure and expectations from fans at the moment. The big surprise to the general people would be Stoke I think. I dont think people see them as a big spender.

I honestly don´t remember who a few days ago said there was nothing wrong with QPR´s transfer plan.... But that "sold column" shows me that there are a major fault in that plan.....

It´s always possible to make a deal and IF it´s true that the agent contacted us we´re in a pretty good position to make a good deal I think. And you can always include a relegation clause if that´s the issue and still make the deal soon.... I think that type of clause is in Norwich´s deal with Ricky van Wolfswinkle.

Oh Charlie, dont get our hopes up Well that would be a dream player for me to get in. First choice CB for 3-4 years ahead. Hooiveld leaving in the summer, Fonte leaving in a year or two. Would be purrfect!

They are talking about Sharp. Do we know if getting him out on loan was a Adkins or a Committee´s decision?

Probably too much to ask that journos these days would follow clubs progression..... Yes we were that, but we are not anymore.

Morgan wouldn´t strengthen England regarding game against Montenegro.

If he was going in for a keeper it would probably be Gazza since he rates him and MP does not seem to do that based on the questions he got on a press conference not long ago....(dont remember which pre game conference it was).