Barry Sanchez

Who is going to pay these prices? Vastly overpriced, if we go down they will be worth less that obvious but they arre worth what they are sold for, speculation on pricing is crazy, our players our in their first season and yet these prices are for established internationals who have been doing it at the top for years. £2 Million for Dean Hammond? Come on please get real. De Ridder and Guly? Forren? How can a player not play and his figure increase, what thought went into that?

I thought the first sending off was Kevin Moran for United for a tackle on Peter Reid and didn't it go in the top left corner?

Theres not much he can do really if its an instinctive shot and he keeps missing he wont get better as you either have it or you dont, for shots where he has time its technique and composure or lackof and that is something he can work on.

I think it come down to composure and the ability to back oneself even when you are not playing well or not scoring, thats the difference between a good and a great player.

You are giving your £5 and its going into the Zimbabwean economy, whats not good about that?

Having lived abroad myself, a lot of ex pats give propaganda, same **** anywhere just a bit sunnier, thats what I found anyway, and the sense of humour here helps as no where else on Earth is as funny as here thats for sure.

So why only a few clubs that have used this system? Surely if its that good all would do it.

Talksport were saying it this morning.

Cheers ta muchly.

I would simply shrug my shoulders and put my heal the World 7" on and then maybe Earth song for a bit of healing.

I meant it for anyone after reading the statement by CB Fry, it was an observation not directed at anyone, I merely quoted you as I was replying to you.

What saying its impressionable and childish is not an insult merely an observation. So sorry if someone is offended as it was not intended.

So I am the only one who thinks buying Uruguan sweatbands is a bit stupid? Christ alive..................................

No thats not a nice effort in fact its pretty childish and impressionable.

I will state the obvious, if he was that good he would of stayed on, Davis came on for a reason, to defend the lead, that sort of tells its own story when there is 35 mins left in a game, if he was being that creative and effective he would of stayed on, he didn't.

We are the most knowledgable fans in the Country FACT.

I am happy to be wrong, I never wanted him in goal but his displays have been above of what I would of expected from this clown, he has saved us some points this season but to be fair thats a goalkeepers job. He has earned the right to wear the number 1 shirt.

It shouldn't do now, all the results finally went for us yesterday, if it does Pochettino is doing something very wrong.

The pendulum swings back this week to the Brazilian 1970's team..........................

Very dangerous, why are we doing that? I thought we were cash rich?

£60 Million from Sky for next season, they have used the money to ease the interest and lower their £70 Million owed to the bank, should this practice be allowed? Should clubs spend what they have not got yet? This is one of the reasons I believe the premiership will eventually eat itself, its completely unsustainable.

To be honest is he not under pressure to play Ramirez, its obvious or to me that at half when our backs were against the wall he brought on Davis, that says a lot as our backs with our players were alwys going to be against the wall this season.

I think today could be key, QPR have now I think have been really hurt (similar to us two weeks ago but thankfully we had more points on the board) from this result and now with Reading losing today could be the day when in all bar the shouting two teams are relegated, the issue is Wigan are playing and Villa will take a lot of heart from this, 2 down 1 to go though so a superb day for Southampton FC I feel.

No, simply put I would rather start with Davis than Ramirez, theres is no debate on that I would.

No I was not there, watched it on the blag.