Unbelievable Jeff

No, it's not - that's where you're misunderstanding. If that is what he means (and he hasn't said), then the phraseology used is incorrect. It would say "For me, this would result in" or something along those lines. Read what he said, again: 'For me, it will be time for riots and violence against the state'. Using that phraseology, that is his opinion on what should happen. If he meant it is what might happen, then the English used is incorrect. As an example, here is GM telling us about what 'might' happen: 'Mark my words, if Brexit is mishandled, 17.4 million voters will be p!$$ed off and some of them will make Paris look like a picnic...'

To be fair to Wes, he does have some balls (or a massive lack of self-awareness) to come back here day after day to get pwned

Why?

I never said it was him that would do it - read what I wrote again. It's his opinion of what should happen - ie, incitement. Give your head a wobble.

Right, let's try this another way. "For me, it will be time for someone should stab Wes Tender in the face". How do you interpret that sentence?

Good for them. Hopefully they'll end up in prison or dead then.

He said 'For me, it will be time for riots and violence against the state'. That's not an opinion of what may happen. That's his opinion of what should happen.

I would say it's probably hard to convictions in court because people who "work" for the CPS don't know what they're doing and decide to prosecute the wrong cases.

No, not now.

Everyone knows Yoshida has to have a dominant CB next to him - not sure why people are surprised when he's playing alongside League 1's Jack Stephens.

RaHa out...

And he's not Mark ****ing Hughes.

But that's all theoretical. We have no idea what Pellegrino would have done in this last games. We can only really work in actuals, and the actuals say he had no effect.

See, the issue is the role of a manager and their affect on the time is intangible. Hughes took over when we were 17th, and we finished 17th, so from a basic point of view he had no effect. If RaHa takes over with us 18th, and we finish 12th, we can say he had a positive effect. However, in both instances only one thing is true. X teams scored more points, X teams scored less.

That works, yep.

I have to say, this is probably our most exciting managerial appointment ever...after our worst.

Hughes didn't keep us up. Swansea and Stoke did.

I'm surprised you've got the nerve to show yourself back on this forum after being proven to be an utter fraud on the Ched Evans thread! #mess

I believe Wes's types call them 'whitie points'.

You seem to be defending yourself and insulting people a lot for someone who's not bothered about others opinions and abuse, have to say.

Update from your English sources is that?

Yeah, not giving you Ward Prowse or Luke Shaw, but the other 3 I guess is right. Not sure whether it's a glowing endorsement of playing youth though - Reed played 4 league games and Gallagher scored 1 in 18 league games. Neither have gone onto bigger or better things than Sims so far though - they all seem to be Championship players.

This would be a shame... https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/dec/04/uk-can-stop-article-50-without-eu-approval-top-ecj-adviser-says

Genuine question as the years all seem to blend together for me, but what young players did Pochettino bring through?