sadoldgit

angry

I doubt if it is a new function but as you probably know if you have some on ignore the post still comes up and it gives you an option to read it. Simples. Why bring it up so much? How many times exactly? I don't think I have brought up that much but I know I can rely on to tell me exactly how many times. I don't read all of your posts just some. As for the liar name calling, you really do need to grow up. I am not a liar and no matter how hard you and your cabal try and make out otherwise it doesn't make it so. By the way, as we are in schoolground mode you had called me a liar when I said you had I I showed the post to prove it. Made things up routinely? Really? The only people who have called me on it are your buddies which says it all. Yes, people have sussed you out. Now this is the bit I really love. After brown nosing your buddy Fry earlier you then use one of his words. Awesome! By the way, did you ever say why you stopped posting on Sotonians? (Squinny LOL)

More name calling. Getting boring now dude.

No surprise that he has been sacked, but it wasn't that long ago everyone was singing his praises! Still, the £3m should help with the Christmas pressies.

sexshop

Quality. Good post for once because you agree with it. Must be the season of goodwill

Carry on name calling Hypo. Its what you are good at. As Lou says, lighten up, it is just a football forum for goodness sakes.

spring

No it wasn't that survey. It was the one that was spun one way and when I span it the other way you went all "CB Fry " on it. Oh and I don't agree with homophobia be it on Saintweb or in Pakistan. Ok?

Lets get a few things straight. I am perfectly entitled to carry on the debate on this thread. I haven't blocked those who disagree with me, just the few that tend to gang up and attack people they decide they have something against. Even when on ignore you can still read posts if you wish and occasionally I read some of your posts. I don't agree that I have been embarrassed. Your efforts fell well short I am afraid but its nice to see that Guan has at least taken your side, bless him. Now you are trying to infer that I am a troll too LOL. Nice. By the way, have you forgotten so quickly all of those posts where you called me a liar and then said that you hadn't (It is true Guan, go and look them up, poor Hypo embarrassed himself). I see that other people have sussed you out too. What happened Hypo? You were quite a reasonable poster on Sotonians. Perhaps you should go back there and stop being so silly.

Hi Whelk, for naïve I would prefer humanitarian. As for possibly bored. Nail on head. I really need to find a new job!

Thanks for the lecture Guan. As for my "flippant response", I genuinely don't know what is meant by Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford etc. That is why I asked for clarification, I still don't know what they mean. As for my gall to bring up taste and decency, I am sure the relatives and loved ones of the slain in that Paris Club would be delighted to know that you posted a picture of their bodies on a football forum before the poor sods were even buried. Way to go fella! ps the bit about inventing phrases and positions didn't actually happen the way you would like to believe it happened. I tried to explain it to Hypo but it seemed to be too much for him as it does for you. Your flowery style leads me to believe that you know something of hyperbole? By the way, it was interesting that no one jumped on the bloke for saying that a Muslim woman had 15 kids but when I said that there are plenty on non Muslim women with 15 kids in Ashford I got ripped apart!

Trying? More so than being called a troll? I was responding to both you and others. You mentioned an "ideological standpoint." I don't know what that means but the going rate here seems to be if you say anything in support of moderate peaceful Muslims you have to be a "Leftie." You seem to have a bee in your bonnet about me ever since I called you on posting the picture of the massacre in Paris. Sorry if you took offence but I still maintain that a football forum is not the place for that kind of stuff.

What are these? Away fixtures you have been too? Can you kindly post me some links so I at least know what you are talking about? Cheers.

As I have been accused of spouting "dangerous" views on another thread perhaps it is time to dispel any ideas that I may be a threat to national security by sharing this snippet of information. Are you sitting comfortably (you know who you are). A close neighbour and friend is a retired Colonel and used to work in British/American intelligence. He served in Northern Ireland and was heavily involved in Desert Storm. In short, he is not someone like the rest of us who sits down killing time by talking b*ll*cks on the internet. He is someone who has been there, done it and worn the t-shirt. He is very much against the bombing of Syria. He doesn't believe that the bombing to date has achieved anything worthwhile and that future bombing will make any difference apart from maybe radicalising more young men to go and get themselves killed. He believes that there are other ways of disabling IS and dealing with the issues in the middle east that don't entail turning a pile of rubble into a smaller pile of rubble. His ideas are nothing new - cutting off funding, arms supplies etc. Better education. Dealing head on with the issues with the Saudis, Turks etc. As I say nothing new but this is a man who served in the army to a high rank and believes that we will not be made safer by the bombings. Now the usual suspects can call me names all day long and pretend that my opinions are somehow "dangerous" but come and spend some time in our local and this guy will wipe the floor with you arguments because he has seen first hand what continued violence has done in the region. And guess what? He also believes that the vast majority of Muslims want a peaceful co-existence. And guess what again? There are millions of people in the country who think the same way. So does that make us all "dangerous?"

Truly bizarre. Lets look at some of my "extreme and dangerous" views. Gay people don't necessarily want to live in Gay ghettoes. Gay people are just like straight people only have different preferences in partners. There are other ways of dealing with the problems in the Middle East other than bombing Syria. The majority of Muslims want to live peacefully. Hey, look at me, I am SO radical I am off the chart. And you say being the opposite end of the spectrum to Trump as if it is a bad thing LOL. If you think that bombing Syria has made us any safer in this country, good luck with that. You and Donald can hide behind your "I am not a bigot" bumper stickers. That should keep you safe.

I am not a "Leftie" so I don't have an ideological standpoint as you call it. I asked for evidence because I don't follow what goes on with the "Left" and haven't been aware of Harman, who I have always assumed is strong on women's issues, wimping out. If she has done then all I asked for was for examples. I read somewhere that she agreed to a segregated audience at one meeting but she explained that was because she was trying to encourage more Muslim women to get involved in politics - not unreasonable. As for me being "a network of trolls operating a parody account" seriously mate, WTF?

Entrails

Is this actually true??? Evidence???

Donald Trump. WTF?

Garters

Belt

That's just showing passion though!

Would have ruled out Australia Duckhunter? Up to a few years back women were not allowed to drink in the same bars as men.

For someone who doesn't get stuck in Pelle seems to get more than his fair share of yellow cards?