kyle04

.... and we're not a "big" club the crooked cunts...

Have to agree, would maybe have been something to see one or two players arguing after goal x went in, but we just strolled back for the restart looking totally beat every time.

Well, 10 men/injuries or not , ManU wont have an easier game in the next 50 years, well done boys, that was an absolute fucking disgrace. It's bad enough with a threadbare squad and being shafted by the officials, but that display was a shambles, a perfect lesson in how not to defend or generally give a fuck about the shirt. We are now the laughing stock of the PL (again)

So if, say, Ings had scored with the ball coming off his shirt sleeve (upper arm?), would the goal stand or be given handball? I think probably the latter, if so the rules don't make sense, if that part of his body was "offside" and so by definition a "legal" area of the body...?

... i foresee the emergence of the PL tank top shirt... So down the table we go, good job we are still 15 pts from the bottom 3 on our current form. Good display 2nd half and a thoroughly undeserved defeat overall. As for VAR, it's a lottery at the moment

I get that but we Yes but we couldn't do it, not once, and kept gifting the ball to Arsenal on our own third on the front foot, so why persist ?

Expected to struggle with such a poor back up squad, defensively a shambles and toothless going forward. Arsenal are improving but were quite average. RH conceded after 80 minutes taking Ings and Walcott off I think. Totally disheartening performance, we looked tired, sloppy and disjointed. We have absolutely no quality outside the first team, and why we kept trying to play out (unsuccessfully) from our own 6 yard box all evening baffled me.

Aside from all the hullaballoo surrounding Trump , I have to say from what little I've seen I've been impressed by Biden recently. He seems a sensible, mature and humane character, maybe what the US needs when Trump and all his self serving vitriol are gone. As far as the shooting is concerned, given that much of the US is still living in the 1860's regarding firearms, I'm surprised and thankful there weren't many more deaths. Whether it was justified is debatable, but ultimately Trump was responsible.

So an employer receives half a dozen identical CV's for the same job (excluding the name). I'd smell a rat. Maybe explains the low response rate ? c'mon Dr, name names then...

It seems that there are a number of people who have nothing better to do than to hunt for perceived racism (and make a decent living out of it). The employer response figures are hardly damning, only 24% of "decent white folk" got a callback, maybe most of the CV's were deemed not good enough for the jobs. If the aim of such vacuous "studies" is to show that prejudice exists in the world, well done. Now what ? Positive descrimination resulting in a disproportionate number of non-white people represented in all walks of life ? White people being sidelined in the crusade for "equality", the probable backlash and rise of the far right, and back to square one we go, a trip to the tailors for Mr Griffin with his new-found popularity. If every non-white resident in this country is encouraged to believe that their failures are due to their skin colour and an oppressive white majority conspiracy, that's just a cop out. Given the diverslty in the UK, we live in one of the most tolerant and fair societies in the world. These people should just fucking grow up.

Ah those were the days, when the proles knew their place, and were glad of it. We can now look forward to the return of the feudal system, curvy cucumbers , Elgar on the wireless and French fishing vessels burning in the North Sea, courtesy of the Senior Service.

The height of ignorance.

"... fuck this I'm off..

"Royal Mail says the aim is to help mark the success of black Britons." Steady, we don't want too many success stories do we, we live in an institutionalized racist country do we not ?

I think it's beginning to get a bit silly now. Anything from history that could be construed as being racist today is being unearthed and villified. Seemingly every organization is falling over them selves to clamber on the band wagon. People's lives are being ruined by one slip of the tongue, white actors in ad-land are nowhere to be seen. As far as football is concerned you would struggle to find a better meritocracy among the playing staff, and the endless taking the knee before every single match is wearing thin. If football allies itself with a pretty sinister organization, whatever the intentions, the ride will not always be a smooth one, and people who voice concerns should not be labelled as racists (although I don't doubt for one minute that the Millwall "fans" who booed did not do so out of a sense of political awareness). Football can't have it all ways, basking in the new found enlightenment of BLM , then say we only agree with the acceptable parts of their message. The English are generally a pretty decent bunch, and don't need repeated knee bending and black power salutes to remind them that racism is wrong.

Either DT dosen't realize what a complete knob he's making himself look like, or it's the last desperate actions of a man knowing he's facing a massive battle to avoid jail when the presidential immunity disappears in January. He's been a total shower his whole life, his business ventures have been financially questionable (re the Atlanta casino venture, where he borrowed at such a high interest rate the casino would never be able to generate revenue to pay back the loan. His father sent an employee in one day who "bought" $1m worth of chips, then promptly left (without the chips), basically a thinly veiled bail out). I don't believe he expected to win the first time, and the massive hard-on that followed his victory has not abated. Mexico did not pay for his abhorent "wall", which will remain incomplete and utterly useless, and the COVID shambles makes him responsible for thousands of preventable deaths. The sad thing is that many thousands of Americans will believe the stolen election dogma for many years to come despite the total lack of any credible evidence. The distrust in the system that turned many voters towards him last time will only be consolidated by this bullshit. It's almost comparable to Hitler in his bunker as the Red Army rumbled through Berlin, planning counter-offensives with forces that didn't exist any more.

You mean make COVID .... illegal ? That might just work...

People who either shit themselves or masturbate on public transport. There really is no need for it.

Michael Jackson....?

Beards on young men, unless you're a geography teacher, a biker, or homeless. The latest TV's that cost as much as a small car and are the size of a, well, massive TV Those f*****g meercat adverts / and the failed "opera" singer on the other ones, nice bloke I'm sure but please just go away. Celebrity culture, OK if you've actually achieved something remarkable but Gemma Collins?? why ? Have to agree with the excess female tattoo thing too, none of my business but it never looks attractive.

From the BBC website : "......Despite the lack of evidence, in May a YouGov poll of 1,640 people suggested 28% of Americans believed Mr Gates wanted to use vaccines to implant microchips in people - with the figure rising to 44% among Republicans. " .........A White House correspondent for a pro-Trump website, Newsmax, told her 264,000 followers on Twitter to "beware" the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. Emerald Robinson claimed in the Tweet: "It tampers with your DNA." Now people are entitled to their opinion, hence the activity on forums such as this, the question is should this sort of shite be allowed to circulate. Free speech is one thing, but without the responsibility the world just decends into a fake news free-for-all and an awful lot of people will "believe" in the unsubstantiated drivel posted online. Most of the time it's relatively harmless (grassy knoll, Diana murdered by MI5 etc), but this is a deadly serious issue with tens of thousands of lives at stake. Allow this content and many people will die after refusing a vaccine, ban it and it will only fuel the cover up conspiracy camp.

Sounds about right these days. You can imagine the police interviewing him as a witness : "Can you describe the person you saw" - "A man" "Can you remember anything about his appearance" - "Sidney Poitier's my favourite actor" "You saw his face, can you describe his ethnicity" - "Can I go now ?" Police are looking for a man in connection with the incident. If anyone has seen a man, please call ......

The article refers mainly to the US, which has a vastly different history regarding racism than the UK, so much so, there's no comparison. The word "coloured" harks back to a time when "coloreds" endured segregation, among other evils, and is rightly seen in that context as offensive. Conversely, in South Africa the term is used without offence apparently, despite the Aparteid history where blacks were seen as unfit to mix with the white minority in any way, about as bad as it could be. So where does that leave the UK with term. We have never practiced slavery, segregation or state sponsored persecution of our non-white population. A handful of NF nutters and a few nasty coppers is no comparison to what's happened, and is happening, in the US. I always thought the term "coloured" was more respectful than "black" for example in this country. Again, the same words in different order can give offence , or not . "Person of colour", fine - "Coloured Person", take him down. Who has decided this in our country and with what authority ? No one seems to know. Many people get "offended" because they're told to. The BLM movement was spawned on the back of police murdering black people at will, which is f*** all to do with this country.

... yes, everyone falling over them selves to prove how worthy they all are, although Clarke describing the burning cross on his front lawn as a bonfire night "decoration" may have contributed to his downfall....

So another persons career destroyed for using an "unacceptable" term to describe, er, people form different backgrounds (??). Having first watched the breaking news thingy at the bottom of the screen, was expecting a Ron Atkinsonesque faux pas. But the term "coloured" which he used is apparently now viewed in the same light as the "N" word, and the term "person of colour" is Ok (is it, I don't know....) . I don't know what was worse, his "resignation" or his cringing appology afterwards.