anothersaintinsouthsea

lol bad luck if you're wrongly convicted then, but of course that never happens.... I can just imagine the thoughts that would (not) go through the minds of potential murders: In the UK: "I'm gonna kill this bloke, I'll be out in 20 years, well worth it" In the US now: "I'm gonna kill this bloke, I'll get the death penalty but with appeals etc that won't happen for ages, well worth it" In Alpinia: "I won't kill this bloke, I'd get killed myself the day after conviction. If only I lived somewhere more liberal like Texas that would give me a few years on death row before execution, I'd definitely do it then."

wow, you're such a cock. that's really what he said isn't it.

And murders take place in countries that already have the death penalty don't they?!

And how would you suggest reducing the murder rate in countries/states where they already have the death penalty?

My brother works with criminals in the legal system - conequences of their actions is far from the minds of the vast majority of criminals when they commit their crimes. The death penalty isn't a deterrent to murder. We know this because 1. Murders still happen in places where they have the death penalty and 2. Most murderers don't consider the consequences of their crimes.

Or if he signs a doesn't score for ages: TD Lee! TD Lee! Scoring goals is nothing to be scared of (to the tune of Prince Charming)

This is brilliant, defo a winner: Oh Lee, oh lee, oh lee, oh lee, oh lee (repeat) To the tune of: Olay, olay, olay, olay, olay, olay

I'd prefer a reference to their impressive shipbuilding industry to be honest. If someone can get in references to solid shipbuilding, cheap cars, quality electronics and the leadership in broadband adoption then I'd definitely be in there How about Tadanari woah Tadanari woah he's a striker for Japan but at under-20 level he was Korean or Tadanari woah Tadanari woah he's a striker for Japan but according to Wikipedia he's ethnic Korean sure to catch on in the Northam no doubt

my pleasure

Well in general I don't see the point in singing songs about a Chief Executive, so I don't sing anything about Cortese. I don't see anything particularly wrong with eating dogs per se I just wouldn't sing a song about Koreans eating dogs. It's not as though that's the only thing that Koreans do or are known for - unless you're a bit ignorant.

tbf Lee is an ethnic Korean - not that I'd join in with a song about eating dogs.

Yep, definitely a different Rupert Lowe.

Turkish defending a racist. I'm so shocked....... In any case I said that this thread AND countless others show Dune to be a racist. You follow?

lol, what would you rather a blindside elbow to the face or a push with an open hand? thought so you mug.

The bull**** merchant liar is back....... hooray.

You said "I haven't seen anyone say that on here, have you?". I proved that someone had. Pedantry works both ways! Anyway I don't see what is dramatic about labelling Dune a resident racist. This thread and countless others show that he is whether he admits it or not. I probably should have used singular rather than plural I admit.

lol, thought it didn't look right. I'd go more for Nina Hagen.

FFS this is like shooting fish in a barrel: Before the verdict in the second trial, but obviously after the verdict of the 1997 inquest which concluded it was a racist attack: After the verdict of the recent trial: Pretty clear eh?

Exactly. Some of our resident racists have decided it wasn't racist despite two different courts in the land coming to official verdicts that it was.

I won't repeat what I've already said. Keep going forum prima donna, you're looking more stupid with every post.

Oh I see. An official court of law, once again, records the crime as a racist crime.

Turkish, wow I'd love to live in your black and white world, everything so simple and clearly defined. It would only be hypocritical if someone said that the Daily Mail is "always wrong" but I've not ever said that and I doubt the forum superstars you allude to have ever said it either. As an aside I have to lol at someone with almost 7,500 posts and a location of "Strolling around unchallenged" calling others forum superstars - you're one of the biggest prima donnas on here. Anyway I really dislike the Mail (tabloids in general really) but that doesn't mean they've never been right. Just as a stopped clock is right twice a day and just as Dune occasionally makes a coherant and rational post then the Daily Mail is sometimes right. Having said that whilst I initially thought "good" when I saw that Daily Mail cover and agreed with the sentiment it did make it more difficult for a fair trial to take place - a shade of grey if you like. There were other ways the Mail could have played things e.g. pressure on the Met or the Government but they went for the sensationalist angle which is what you expect from a tabloid.

So is he likely to be match-fit/pushing for selection right away?

"Whatever" - ah, the last vestige of the crap debator.

Think (generally) people need to chill out and stop over analysing. This is a tough competitive league, losing a few key players to injury or loss of form can make a big difference. I watch Watford rip QPR a new one at Loftus Rd last season, they still went on to be Champions.....