Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

My sons friend just said his older brother was gay as he was going to to a Minecraft experience in London

the world is healing

  • Haha 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
11 hours ago, Turkish said:

What a strange source. I thought msn was a news source not an opinion bank?

What i found curious was no mention for the details of the ruling, it made it sound like an outright victory when a lot of the claims were thrown out.

  • Haha 1
Posted

There once was a poster called pingpong

Born with a perfect working dingdong

He sliced it right off

And Ducky did scoff 

As pingpong was now a bird.

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, pingpong said:

What a strange source. I thought msn was a news source not an opinion bank?

What i found curious was no mention for the details of the ruling, it made it sound like an outright victory when a lot of the claims were thrown out.

Great result regardless, yes?

Posted (edited)
On 19/01/2026 at 21:00, Weston Super Saint said:

Which bit of the article is 'opinion' rather than factual?

Apart from the missing facts around the details of the ruling, a lot of hyperbole, language like "Incredibly" and "paralysed with fear" for example. Most journalist would use quote marks, or make it clear it was a description from a person, rather than describing an event there is no evidence for as though it is factual. Especially when the ruling found that the claims from the nurses were deeply exaggerated and that they had a personal vendetta against the doctor, who only ever followed the NHS policies. The ruling was against the NHS, not her...

Edited by pingpong
All of which is fine by the way, for an opinion piece. My surprise was that I thought msn was just news, but maybe I am a decade or two out of date.
Posted
5 hours ago, pingpong said:

Apart from the missing facts around the details of the ruling, a lot of hyperbole, language like "Incredibly" and "paralysed with fear" for example. Most journalist would use quote marks, or make it clear it was a description from a person, rather than describing an event there is no evidence for as though it is factual. Especially when the ruling found that the claims from the nurses were deeply exaggerated and that they had a personal vendetta against the doctor, who only ever followed the NHS policies. The ruling was against the NHS, not her...

You do know the article was written by Giles Sheldrick and published in the Daily Express?

I assume MSN have just republished it as it was printed / published in the Express rather than writing it themselves?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...