Pilchards Posted Tuesday at 18:44 Posted Tuesday at 18:44 First game on Wednesday. Doesn't feel like a Southern team with only two Hampshire players in. Southern have Jamie Smith, Rew, Pepper, Rashid and Abel. Great bowling attack but the batting feels weak IMHO. 1
Lighthouse Posted Tuesday at 20:39 Posted Tuesday at 20:39 1 hour ago, Pilchards said: First game on Wednesday. Doesn't feel like a Southern team with only two Hampshire players in. Southern have Jamie Smith, Rew, Pepper, Rashid and Abel. Great bowling attack but the batting feels weak IMHO. Nah, that definitely sounds like a Hampshire team. 1
Hodgey Posted Tuesday at 20:52 Posted Tuesday at 20:52 By my count there is one Hampshire player (Lumsden) and one Sussex player who barely plays for them (Archer). I’m not having Stubbs. So much for the early talk of it being linked to the counties. We do have 3 Surrey players though. they’ve also managed to get 4 wicket keepers ! not sure I agree with you on the batting - Pepper, Miller, Stoinis, Smith, Rew and Stubbs can all whack it about on their day. you’ve also got a load of lower order clubbers in Jordan, Archer, Worrel, Rashid who are all more than capable. looks a decent side to me, but as pointed out none of these have really played together so will need to gel quickly. Seems to be more stars this year connected to the various multi-owner franchises, not sure any of these sides have any real connection to their counties anymore in terms of players - they all seem to have swapped sides. 2
Pilchards Posted yesterday at 02:19 Author Posted yesterday at 02:19 Impressive comments and yes maybe the batting line up could be good if gelled together. Does feel weird that Vince is playing for London while Sonny Baker, Dawson for Manchester I think. Lets see how it goes this evening.
badgerx16 Posted yesterday at 07:43 Posted yesterday at 07:43 The sooner this pantomime is over, the better. 1
Window Cleaner Posted yesterday at 11:16 Posted yesterday at 11:16 14 hours ago, Hodgey said: By my count there is one Hampshire player (Lumsden) and one Sussex player who barely plays for them (Archer). I’m not having Stubbs. So much for the early talk of it being linked to the counties. We do have 3 Surrey players though. they’ve also managed to get 4 wicket keepers ! not sure I agree with you on the batting - Pepper, Miller, Stoinis, Smith, Rew and Stubbs can all whack it about on their day. you’ve also got a load of lower order clubbers in Jordan, Archer, Worrel, Rashid who are all more than capable. looks a decent side to me, but as pointed out none of these have really played together so will need to gel quickly. Seems to be more stars this year connected to the various multi-owner franchises, not sure any of these sides have any real connection to their counties anymore in terms of players - they all seem to have swapped sides. That's right. The Hundred has distanced itself from regular cricket. I don't care, can't follow it anyway,well apart from looking at the scores.
Lighthouse Posted yesterday at 14:04 Posted yesterday at 14:04 Welsh Fire Men just sounds like a calendar you'd buy your mother in law fo Christmas. 1
Gloucester Saint Posted yesterday at 18:45 Posted yesterday at 18:45 (edited) We’ll see what the wicket’s like when they bat on it but not an inspiring start. Smith got a peach from Cook but he’s also shit. Stubbs carrying on his brilliant contribution from Finals Day. At least Thomas Rew and David Miller can bat (even if Miller is almost old enough to be Rew’s dad). Edited yesterday at 18:47 by Gloucester Saint
Pilchards Posted yesterday at 19:43 Author Posted yesterday at 19:43 11 hours ago, badgerx16 said: The sooner this pantomime is over, the better. What about you don’t watch it if you’re not happy with it?
badgerx16 Posted yesterday at 20:38 Posted yesterday at 20:38 (edited) 54 minutes ago, Pilchards said: What about you don’t watch it if you’re not happy with it? i don't watch it. I just think it is a totally unnecessary imposition on the cricketing calendar. Edited yesterday at 20:38 by badgerx16 1
Hodgey Posted yesterday at 21:14 Posted yesterday at 21:14 Pilchards - I’m giving it another couple of games but early indications side with you ! Not sure why they started with McKinney - I thought he was squad filler like Lumsden. Can only assume Pepper is injured. Didnt watch much of it but what I saw was pretty boring with a bored crowd. Also not sure about home advantage when none of your players play there…..
Toadhall Saint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 22/07/2026 at 09:43, badgerx16 said: The sooner this pantomime is over, the better. That sounds a bit pompous
Lighthouse Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Baker chucking pies in tonight’s game, then giving away four by stacking it on the boundary. 1
Window Cleaner Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago On 22/07/2026 at 09:43, badgerx16 said: The sooner this pantomime is over, the better. Oh no it isn't !
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now