70's Mike Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 Cannot be long before these and the statement to the LSE are due out. Trying to find out when last years figures were released . Any one know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Saint Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 Cannot be long before these and the statement to the LSE are due out. Trying to find out when last years figures were released . Any one knowWold normally expect them in the first week of March but these are not normal times. Not sure there is any legal obligation for them to publish. Anyone know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 It certainly would be interesting to see the wages that have been offloaded versus the fall in attendances, and whether it is sustainable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 Wold normally expect them in the first week of March but these are not normal times. Not sure there is any legal obligation for them to publish. Anyone know? If they are good, Lowe will publish them. If they arent, he wont. We will be able to judge how things are going simply from that.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 Wold normally expect them in the first week of March but these are not normal times. Not sure there is any legal obligation for them to publish. Anyone know? Three months is the deadline (as far as I can remember) and that will be end of March at the latest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Saint Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 Three months is the deadline (as far as I can remember) and that will be end of March at the latest.For half year? Is there a legal reqirement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 If they are good, Lowe will publish them. If they arent, he wont. We will be able to judge how things are going simply from that.. i wont be here but I will make a prediction now..(and this can be saved) if they are good (and I mean good in our terms) lowe will be slated for loaning out certain players if they are bad, lowe will be slated for being here... I guarantee that this will be said by many Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 If they are good, Lowe will publish them. If they arent, he wont. We will be able to judge how things are going simply from that.. To be fair that is his prerogative... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 23 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 23 February, 2009 For half year? Is there a legal reqirement? i think it is a Stock Exchange requirement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 23 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 23 February, 2009 To be fair that is his prerogative... Do not think so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 For half year? Is there a legal reqirement? Yes, I'm sure LSE main listing rule is 90 days and AIM listing rules are 3 months (not much in it, but they have to be different!!!!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Saint Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 Found it myself under AIMS rules An AIM company must prepare a half-yearly report in respect of the six month period from the end of the financial period for which financial information has been disclosed in its admission document and at least every subsequent six months thereafter (apart from the final period of six months preceding its accounting reference date for its annual audited accounts.) All such reports must be notified without delay and in any event not later than three months after the end of the relevant period. The information contained in a half-yearly report must include at least a balance sheet, an income statement, a cash flow statement and must contain comparative figures for the corresponding period in the preceding financial year. Additionally the half-yearly report must be presented and prepared in a form consistent with that which will be adopted in the AIM company’s annual accounts having regard to the accounting standards applicable to such annual accounts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 Found it myself under AIMS rules An AIM company must prepare a half-yearly report in respect of the six month period from the end of the financial period for which financial information has been disclosed in its admission document and at least every subsequent six months thereafter (apart from the final period of six months preceding its accounting reference date for its annual audited accounts.) All such reports must be notified without delay and in any event not later than three months after the end of the relevant period. The information contained in a half-yearly report must include at least a balance sheet, an income statement, a cash flow statement and must contain comparative figures for the corresponding period in the preceding financial year. Additionally the half-yearly report must be presented and prepared in a form consistent with that which will be adopted in the AIM company’s annual accounts having regard to the accounting standards applicable to such annual accounts. I'm outraged that you didn't trust me Ron!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Saint Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 I'm outraged that you didn't trust me Ron!!!!!Now if you had told me it was Rule 16 I would have accepted your advice unconditionally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Give it to Ron Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 i wont be here but I will make a prediction now..(and this can be saved) if they are good (and I mean good in our terms) lowe will be slated for loaning out certain players if they are bad, lowe will be slated for being here... I guarantee that this will be said by many Well the loaning out of certain players has had such a wonderful result on both the league position and gate hasn't it. You luvvies do go to such great lengths to ignore the facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 (edited) Well the loaning out of certain players has had such a wonderful result on both the league position and gate hasn't it. You luvvies do go to such great lengths to ignore the facts. are you a ****.. why cant someone have an opinion (and I bet what I say come true) without being branded.. here is one for you ...I dont like lowe...I wish he was not here...saying that, dont know if that makes what I said have any relevance to lowe or not...just predicting what will be said Edited 23 February, 2009 by Thedelldays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 23 February, 2009 Share Posted 23 February, 2009 i wont be here but I will make a prediction now..(and this can be saved) if they are good (and I mean good in our terms) lowe will be slated for loaning out certain players if they are bad, lowe will be slated for being here... I guarantee that this will be said by many LOL I'll make a prediction - and you can save this one if you like Lowe will say something and there will be some people that agree with what he says and some people will disagree. Crouch will say something and there will be some people that agree with what he says and some people will disagree. Wilde, will probably never be heard from again - except in the programme notes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Le Shearer Posted 24 February, 2009 Share Posted 24 February, 2009 i wont be here but I will make a prediction now..(and this can be saved) if they are good (and I mean good in our terms) lowe will be slated for loaning out certain players if they are bad, lowe will be slated for being here... I guarantee that this will be said by many come on lads....all hail Mr. Nostradamus ! but seriously..get a grip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Bones Posted 24 February, 2009 Share Posted 24 February, 2009 LOL I'll make a prediction - and you can save this one if you like Lowe will say something and there will be some people that agree with what he says and some people will disagree. Crouch will say something and there will be some people that agree with what he says and some people will disagree. Wilde, will probably never be heard from again - except in the programme notes Goddam it man - You've just shortened about 200 threads in the last few months into one post ! TOO BLOODY TRUE MATE ! If we can just remember at the end of the day - we all have opinions, but we are all Saints fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 24 February, 2009 Share Posted 24 February, 2009 come on lads....all hail Mr. Nostradamus ! but seriously..get a grip. you dont think that what I posted will be trotted out by stanley and co..? I think you should get a grip.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFartPants Posted 24 February, 2009 Share Posted 24 February, 2009 It will be pretty much like TDD's says. If Lowe has saved the club millions he will be held liable for our poor league position (even if we survive) and if the reduced gates mean he hasn't addressed the debt enough then it will be "Lowe had no idea all along." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Give it to Ron Posted 24 February, 2009 Share Posted 24 February, 2009 It will be pretty much like TDD's says. If Lowe has saved the club millions he will be held liable for our poor league position (even if we survive) and if the reduced gates mean he hasn't addressed the debt enough then it will be "Lowe had no idea all along." So is all of that a big shock then? Is this club and fans all happy and singing from the same songsheet? Of course not and there are major divisions in the 3 groups and I find it quite amazing that you think there will not be point scoring from all sides. You only have to see the threads raise recently with Jonah and his hangers on thrashing out like wounded sharks at 16 year olds with acne and popular members on here. There are then the Crouch followers whose fan friendly rhetoric see them swallow all that gumph. Funnily enough there are not many Wilde supporters who are prepared to stick their necks above the parapet. I want them all gone and realise that this is not possible but for the good of the club why cant they all disappear into the background and appoint an independant CEO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFartPants Posted 24 February, 2009 Share Posted 24 February, 2009 So is all of that a big shock then? Is this club and fans all happy and singing from the same songsheet? Of course not and there are major divisions in the 3 groups and I find it quite amazing that you think there will not be point scoring from all sides. You only have to see the threads raise recently with Jonah and his hangers on thrashing out like wounded sharks at 16 year olds with acne and popular members on here. There are then the Crouch followers whose fan friendly rhetoric see them swallow all that gumph. Funnily enough there are not many Wilde supporters who are prepared to stick their necks above the parapet. I want them all gone and realise that this is not possible but for the good of the club why cant they all disappear into the background and appoint an independant CEO? Now that to me seems like the best way forward from all this. The only thing that would stop it working would be people using words like "puppet" directly after the name Lowe, Wilde or Crouch. Good idea though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 24 February, 2009 Share Posted 24 February, 2009 So is all of that a big shock then? Is this club and fans all happy and singing from the same songsheet? Of course not and there are major divisions in the 3 groups and I find it quite amazing that you think there will not be point scoring from all sides. You only have to see the threads raise recently with Jonah and his hangers on thrashing out like wounded sharks at 16 year olds with acne and popular members on here. There are then the Crouch followers whose fan friendly rhetoric see them swallow all that gumph. Funnily enough there are not many Wilde supporters who are prepared to stick their necks above the parapet. I want them all gone and realise that this is not possible but for the good of the club why cant they all disappear into the background and appoint an independant CEO? I am sure we will soon be disappointed and moaning about the new guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 24 February, 2009 Share Posted 24 February, 2009 I want them all gone and realise that this is not possible but for the good of the club why cant they all disappear into the background and appoint an independant CEO? Because one of them would never accept that as long as he had a hole in his arse. I wonder if you can guess which one ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 28 March, 2009 Author Share Posted 28 March, 2009 so the accounts should be announced Monday or Tuesday if the three month rule is to be met. Interesting week ahead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefuriousb Posted 28 March, 2009 Share Posted 28 March, 2009 Because one of them would never accept that as long as he had a hole in his arse. I wonder if you can guess which one ? To be fair, all 3 are guilty as charged of rearing their heads at some point. We all know, though, which one you feel this statement applies solely to. (yawn) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amesbury Saint Posted 29 March, 2009 Share Posted 29 March, 2009 so the accounts should be announced Monday or Tuesday if the three month rule is to be met. Interesting week ahead given that we have not gone into admin, whilst they maybe bad they clearly cannot be too bad. Chairmans statement "Since my return to SLH 6 months ago, I have sought, with the help of my fellow directors, to put the club finances on a stronger footing. This has involved reducing costs and making difficult decisions regarding the size of the playing staff squad. In terms of costs we have reduced expenditure by 45% on the comparative period last year and we continue to have the support of Barclays Bank and Norwich Union. In terms of our league position, whilst it is not as good as I would have hoped, we are have the opportunity to avoid relegation this year. I am sure that the the young players have benefited from regular first team action etc. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amesbury Saint Posted 29 March, 2009 Share Posted 29 March, 2009 given that we have not gone into admin, whilst they maybe bad they clearly cannot be too bad. Chairmans statement "Since my return to SLH 6 months ago, I have sought, with the help of my fellow directors, to put the club finances on a stronger footing. This has involved reducing costs and making difficult decisions regarding the size of the playing staff squad. In terms of costs we have reduced expenditure by 45% on the comparative period last year and we continue to have the support of Barclays Bank and Norwich Union. In terms of our league position, whilst it is not as good as I would have hoped, we are have the opportunity to avoid relegation this year. I am sure that the the young players have benefited from regular first team action etc. " for the avoidance of doubt I have made this up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 29 March, 2009 Share Posted 29 March, 2009 To be fair, all 3 are guilty as charged of rearing their heads at some point. We all know, though, which one you feel this statement applies solely to. (yawn) What bollllocks. Wilde has taken a backseat twice already. Crouch has also indicated his willingness to do so. Only Lowe demands that if he is involved, he is the boss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Marco Posted 29 March, 2009 Share Posted 29 March, 2009 It will be pretty much like TDD's says. If Lowe has saved the club millions he will be held liable for our poor league position (even if we survive) and if the reduced gates mean he hasn't addressed the debt enough then it will be "Lowe had no idea all along." Or of course it can go the other way. The results are released and Lowe has saved the club almost nothing. In his almost year return at the club he will blame it on the previous board yada yada. Then will be held liable for not only not saving the club as much money as you guys make out he is saving but also be liable for our current league situation. But of course it all depends on how you look at it. Im sure your find something to praise him about even if he gets us relegated,makes us bankrupt and steals the head off the ted bates statue etc.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 29 March, 2009 Share Posted 29 March, 2009 They won't make nice reading that is for sure. The share price doesn't drop to almost nothing for no reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefuriousb Posted 30 March, 2009 Share Posted 30 March, 2009 What bollllocks. Wilde has taken a backseat twice already. Crouch has also indicated his willingness to do so. Only Lowe demands that if he is involved, he is the boss. So the fact that Wilde has "taken a back seat twice" suggests what, you tool? The fact that Crouch stormed out of the AGM, but did stop to give rather cringe-worthy interviews to the local media, suggests what??? The fact that Lowe slid back under the door in the summer together with that happy to let things lie Michael Wilde siggests what?? Let me tell you, shall I? It suggests that none one of them give a toss about what I good for the club and its supporters, but what is only best for their own egos! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 30 March, 2009 Share Posted 30 March, 2009 So the fact that Wilde has "taken a back seat twice" suggests what, you tool? The fact that Crouch stormed out of the AGM, but did stop to give rather cringe-worthy interviews to the local media, suggests what??? The fact that Lowe slid back under the door in the summer together with that happy to let things lie Michael Wilde siggests what?? Let me tell you, shall I? It suggests that none one of them give a toss about what I good for the club and its supporters, but what is only best for their own egos! My original point was that Crouch and Wilde are happy to allow someone else to lead. That is a fact borne out by evidence, whatever you may think and whatever level of abuse you sink to. Lowe wont work for the benefit of the club unless he is in charge. Also borne out by evidence. F**king be a man and deal with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefuriousb Posted 30 March, 2009 Share Posted 30 March, 2009 My original point was that Crouch and Wilde are happy to allow someone else to lead. That is a fact borne out by evidence, whatever you may think and whatever level of abuse you sink to. Lowe wont work for the benefit of the club unless he is in charge. Also borne out by evidence. F**king be a man and deal with it. I see no evidence to the contrary. And thanks for stooping to my level, or should I pat myself on the back for stooping down to yours to begin with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eelpie Posted 30 March, 2009 Share Posted 30 March, 2009 i wont be here Don't do it TDD. We need you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge too far Posted 31 March, 2009 Share Posted 31 March, 2009 Have the accounts been published yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Saint Posted 31 March, 2009 Share Posted 31 March, 2009 Have the accounts been published yet?No. Expected tomorrow if they follow last years publicised date. Don't read to much into them though. They will be very out of date as to our present predicament, unless they issue a trading update at the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now