hypochondriac

Well yes apart from the fact that quite a few of them are evil cunts.

Where did I say you can't respond how you like? You just made that up. You can respond however you want but you don't see me whining on about other people being childish or asking for grown up discussion when you've thrown insults around continuously. You're right though you do get on my nerves because you keep referring to me when I wasn't even in the discussion. Like I said, I just think you're wrong and you think that people who disagree with you are evil or cunts. You can't have any sort of reasonable discussion with someone who is like that. You're clearly just very angry about this particular topic and you can't accept that not everyone agrees with you and you're taking it out on me because I've been one of the most vocal about disagreeing with you. You'll probably just call me an idiot, a moron or a cunt again now but I think that just underlines your hypocrisy.

Exactly. Sick to death of people on here putting words in my mouth for things I haven't said. It's pathetic.

"shown true colours". You're a proper bellend mate. You've flung invective my way at every opportunity on this thread yet have the gall to call other people childish and suggesting they post in a more grown up manner on a poxy Web forum? You've got some brass neck I'll give you that. Are you really incapable of differentiating between the content of a post and the attitude of the person posting it? The difference is that I and other people disagree with you, you and soggy think the people that disagree with you are evil. I happen to find the supercilious, morally superior posting style of soggy and the way that he very obviously hunts the Internet and concentrates solely on one side of the conflict and then purports to be talking about both sides to be very amusing and worthy of mockery and I'll respond how I choose thanks. If it suits you to believe that I'm doing it because I find dead children funny then I'm afraid that says rather more about you and the caricature you've built up in your head of those on this thread who disagree with you.

There once was a man named Russell Who was vegan so lacked certain muscles For possession he cared And had lego for hair And with Sunak he had quite a tussle Almost works.

Father to three girls apparently as well. Totally fine with a bloke getting his cock out next to them in the changing rooms.

Not that I think I have much of a chance but heres a quick begging post to anyone who has a load of aways and can't make the game for whatever reason - if someone has a couple of tickets to the game on Sunday I'd be eternally grateful. Do a good deed and help out a fellow fan

Isn't the point that you don't know who the ones committing the offences are so every man in a woman's space feels like a threat to some women. You had the head of a rape crisis centre saying that any women threatened by the sight of a man using the centres need to become less bigoted. That's clearly wrong.

Don't threaten me with a good time.

I'm not sure what you'd be looking at. Is someone making the argument that a bloke in a dress should be barred from the men's changing room because another bloke might not like it? If so I haven't seen that articulated anywhere and it obviously isn't anything like the same scale as biological men in the women's.

I don't think the two are particularly comparable to be honest. The potential threat a biological man poses to a female in a woman's space is clearly leagues greater than a man in a dress in the gents.

What should young girls do if they feel upset or nervous by the sight of a biological man in their toilets and changing rooms? Suck it up?

A Leeds fan I spoke to said it was 1998.

Just going home after a pint. I thought we were decent today. Downes is immense and we need him for the games ahead. I was very interested to see the amount of long balls we tried today but our play seemed more purposeful and quicker which was great to see. I wanted to take some positives and there wrre loads today for next week.

What evidence do you have that "majority of props have a desire to change". The evidence suggests the opposite.