StuRomseySaint

I think he was giving his opinion on her as a actress, to be fair, I didn't like her either.

OOOOh Arfur

I never played cricket thing.

... when I googled mine, it seems I am famous and appear in a few things I have no idea about. What is this.... http://www.watersidetaekwondoclub.co.uk/new_page_53.htm all about????

If your council tax was to be spent on buying St Marys Stadium, as opposed to paying for the upkeep of your childrens schools, the estate you live on, community facilities for you and your children, regeneration around the city etc etc.... would you thank the Saints Trust for their campaign, for claiming to be representing 838 people?

I admire your loyalty to the Trust, and I agree it would be impossible to canvass their membership on EVERY issue, if they had been making proposals and releasing statements every week. However they have NEVER bothered to canvass their members, EVER about anything. All the Trust is, is half a dozen blokes, all of whom are desperate to get one of them on the board. They do not represent anyone but themselves, they do not respect their members, and they claim to represent a completely made up number of Saints fans. Now I am not sure of the exact numbers, but I suggest that about 50% of Southampton residents would have voted AGAINST the two MP's representing them in the House of Parliment, so why the hell would they want them to represent their football team. Do you think it is right that the Trust should be campaigning for Southampton City Council to spend the majority of the membership base ( Southampton residents ) council tax on buying St Marys? Do you think that all of the Saints Trust members would have been happy with that? Personally I would rather have more education facilities for my kids, better hospitals and regeneration rather than having my council tax paid on a football stadium. Do you not think that maybe, just maybe they were completely out of order proposing something WHICH AFFECTS EVERY PERSON IN SOUTHAMPTON , without communicating with their members, to see if their members are happy to pay for the stadium out of their pockets effectively. They are a bunch of frauds, they STILL have not changed their membership figure on the home page. It would take them 2 seconds, they dont have 838 members, not anywhere near it, I made their board members aware of it months ago, and it still has not changed. Please ST, don't come on here saying 'we have not had time to update it' and all that b*llocks, I know Steve Grant well enough to know he is professional enough when he coded in a membership counter, for it to be simple to amend to reflect membership. Saints Trust are a joke, give up.

To be fair, my kids are 9 and 10... obviously not with the mum anymore though. And another thing, where have you been Farty? It has been at least 2 years since my fatty ****ging days... I have been living with my current missus for the last 18 months! Where have you been?!

So, I am never one to pass up a tip, call me old fashioned...... Luckily when I came in from from work tonight, the missus had a couple of her mates over, so I vacated sharpish and headed to the pub, forgetting to place the bet. Woops.

Nope, they are the chairmans office, sales offices etc and the 'visiting directors room' which is just a small room for them to conduct business..... the boardroom is directly opposite the MLT suite, above the Mick Channon Suite.

You probably are, you just don't know it.

More public statements from the Trust. When did the Trust canvass their members to come to the conclusion that their membership want Crouch back now, and also the 2 local MP's on the board? Seriously, this is starting to take the p!ss now.

The thing is though, are these 320 members paid up in the last year? Or did they simply tick a box? I could get 320 peoples details in a day without any problems if I set up a Rupert Lowe Out group or similar. There was more than 320 people on both marches, and more than 320 people on Connors little Facebook group, so the 'Demonstration against the running of SFC' is actually a bigger organisation that the Trust.... maybe we should campaign for Connor to have a place on the board.

March from the City Centre, you do not need the 'backing' of the police to do it. Give the police some work to do. The more disruption, the better.

... which is directly above the Mick Channon Suite, which is where everyone sings up to.

People are against the Trust because you treat your members with so much contempt and disrespect, only interested in your own personal agendas which your little clique discuss in the pub together. Maybe if you started acting like an organisation, canvassing your members, taking votes before coming up with your wacky proposals, then you can truely claim to represent your members.

This is seriously getting tedious now. A few quick questions for the Trust if I may, they have been avoiding my questions for the last year or so. 1) How many members do you really have? I would see a members criteria as the following... - Has paid a subscription in the last year. - Has opted in to renew from their renewal. 2) How have you communicated your recent proposals to your members, have they passed these motions and voted for you to carry these forward? Seriously Saints Trust board members, do everyone a favour and give it a rest, get with the picture that 99.99999% of Saints fans want you nowhere near the board of Southampton FC You represent nobody but yourself, there is probably at least 100 shareholders which have more of a holding in SFC than yours. You are just a small group of people intent on getting as close to the juicy gossip as possible, it's embarrassing. A geeky 16 year old has done more proactive work in the last 2 weeks than you bunch have done in the last 2 years. Give up.

lol, this is the bestest protest ever! Seriously, you will be lucky if you get a couple of dozen people bringing roses etc... A much more effective and easy way would be to lay scarfs, old shirts, season tickets, flags, banners etc, it would look gay as f*ck, but not half as a couple of dozen roses! Connor buddy, ever heard the expression 'quit whilst you're ahead' ? I know I said you need to change things, but by doing so you need to raise the pressure and intensity of the protests.

That the death was not Jillyanne.

I am Corpy, I have my own Ltd company set up and 4 websites which are bringing in some cash, however it will be at least another 6 months before I start proactively selling onto them, hence I am not at a stage to work on them full-time. . I will have a look at your suggested agencies, thanks sweetie. xx

Because your a lazyass. And anyway, even when you were working, you were a recruitment consultant, the bottom of the sales ladder. So what have you achieved in your career to allow you to work one day a week?

The point I was trying to make is that you should never go to an interview thinking you are going to take a job if offered. Hence responding to Hammys point about why would I go to an interview and then turn down the job. Anyway, you only work 1 day a week and sleep in till 3pm, so are hardly in a position to teach me work/interview ethics.

I have heard this is actually a good thing to do and alot of people make alot of money playing poker in the mornings against drunk/tired yanks due to the time difference. Get up and have a shower, go downstairs and use the dining room table, give up the weed. It will help your concentration levels which means you will earn more money. No need to thank me.

See this is the thing Hammy, I have applied for loads of jobs before, been offered the job, then turned it down. There is a common misconception that an interview is all about the candidate selling himself, well it works both ways, it is also about the company selling themselves and the position to me. In interviews, I spend almost as much time asking questions to them, as they do to me, a tactic which seems to work well, from these questions I decide whether to take a job if I am offered one.

8:40am and I have... - Walked the dog a couple of miles. - Done the school run. - Made my breakfast. - Been to the shop. - Had a shower. And I am now showered and ready for work, which isn't until 12:30 Go me.

Of course it is acceptable to be out on the lash at 9am, much more productive than festering in your pit, wouldn't you agree?