I can see both sides of the argument, the innocent until proven guilty. Of course this may never be proven, but it does not mean he did not say or do anything. Could be one word against another. But I cannot see why AF would make this up, but I cannot see why JT would say or do anything that is racist, and especially to the brother or cousin of his England team mate.
But as someone on here pinted out yesterday, in any other normal job you would be suspended from work until after you were found guilty or innocent. I do not think it should be any different in this case.
So Chelsea should perhaps make a stance, but then you will get all sorts of claims, just to get top players suspended. In the normal work place this of course would not happen.