Robsk II

It's very, very easy to say that, but for some reason some people just put themselves in bad situations or get complex emotional **** going on. There's all sorts pf psychology in it. I'm not defending it; it's never OK and it does just hurt people. But to say it's simply spineless is a gross over-simplification that doesn't take into account the may nuances of living life.

Getting the sneaky scores and practice in, we know your game Granty.

Yeah, well Deppo - you don't know what Baj and Steve put into this place, and if they want to turn it into a place with less users or a place without mods that's their perogative. You need to have a think about it really.

Jizz in your pants!

Um. Erm. OK.

Yours is probably some nasty yellowish brown through under-use or over-w*nking. One or the other. I might dye my hair ginger just to please you, big boy.

Exactly. It's a tough time.

What a f*ck.

c*nt.

No.

No story. Just drivel pouring unfiltered from the sewage outlet that is Dog's brain.

Weird.

Deppo IS Reg Dwight.

Inaccurate, yet hilarious.

Elton John.

Saints, the last few years

The Divine Comedy and yes I know it was Dante

What is it you actually DO all day, Dog? Are you in some kind of home?

I agree. But I also think that the 'just in case' path is emminently treadable with a bit less profiteering from people. Of course we need advancement, but you could say global agendas for change and legislation to force, for example, car companies to invest in electric cars.. (and actually make them good with a good infrastructure) would force entirely palatable change very quickly. I mean... it's like car safety. The technology exists to make cars super safe 9of course drivers should still drive carefully..) but companies still want to make huge profits so generally don't really invest as much as they could do into the long view. understandable from a business sense, but the first company to do something revolutionary, by taking risks, often reaps the rewards long term. Dyson, for example.

Wow. What a load of **** that is. OK, I blame the money-makers, then. The only reason for doing that, with that supposed reason, is to try to make it maerketable in those areas because they might not be ripping quite enough of the population of the world off already on things like Sky fees and heightened ticket prices.

If I was of your sexual persuasion, i'd be a giver, not a taker, unlike yourself. But don't get any ideas about us getting together. I'm all for personal freedoms, but I don't swing that way. And I said 'I believe' because I wasn't actually there at the time. You know how it is; you always have to go on hear-say or confessions. Probably for the best. Anyway, I'm pretty certain this applies to most people back in their younger days. If cheating is a snog, then certainly.

I'm with Minty. There shouldn't be a reason not to take it off really, if it's just out of exultation or some 'hilarious' celebration, provided it's all back on again quickly (unlike Forlan).

The way I see it is that if there's any possibility of truth in all this, then we should reduce emissions anyway. They can't be GOOD, whatever way you look at it, and sooner or later we clearly will need alternative clean and renewable energy. These facts alone suggest we should make efforts to pollute the world less and make things a bit better generally. Hardly hippy rubbish.

Ooh, I'm game. Helmet. Snake. Trouser-eel.

OK then clever clogs. How is it on PC?