aintforever

Try reading the thread, the 30-70% was a figure Turkish came up with.

Brilliant.

Hang on a minute.

I know it's difficult for you to understand but if it is 30-70% more contagious it doesn't have to make illness any more serious to kill more people.

I think Ings plays better with Che up front so I would drop Redmond, other than that I think the lack of decent options means the shower that played last night keep their places.

Cheers, just booked mine for Friday as well.

Bring Jankewitz on now and he might beat his minutes record.

Yeah he’s obviously brilliant, that’s why he can’t get on the pitch ahead of this pile of shite.

Yeah, he really impressed last time.

This bunch of cunts havn’t got a prayer against Leicester.

Problem is our squad is garbage.

Playing like a bunch of cunts.

You talk so much shit it’s unreal. First you say airport expansions have no impact on the number of flights because they just move planes from different airports, then you say aviation is continually expanding.

Under the airport’s own projections future carbon emissions will rise on average by 350,000 tonnes a year. From Eastliegh council's own site: "Among the speakers, was Felix Eigenbrod, a Professor of Applied Spatial Ecology in the Department of Geography and Environmental Science at the University of Southampton. Professor Eigenbrod was one of five academics who had co-authored a letter to the committee along with an economist, Professor Christopher Heady. A graduate of Cambridge and Yale, Professor Heady has previously been consulted by the IMF and World Bank among many other leading International institutions. Given these credentials it was clear that the expert evidence presented by Professor Eigenbrod and his colleagues would weigh with the panel. A key passage in the academics’ letter asserts that the additional carbon emissions caused by airport expansion would quickly exceed the total carbon produced by the entire Eastleigh area by 160% and by 2032 the effect of the extra emissions would be the equivalent of adding a town of 98,000 people. They concluded that “The magnitude of these climate impacts threatens to dwarf any climate mitigation efforts by Eastleigh Borough Council.”

So on one hand you are saying the runway extension won't mean any more flights, and the other you say without the extension there will be zero flights out of Southampton (regional or international). Brilliant!

I disagree, the hassle of Heathrow and Gatwick compared to the ease of flying out of Southampton would definitely be a factor.

Of course it will mean more flights, there is no reason to invest millions in runways if it doesn't increase capacity. Gatwick and Heathrow will be back to normal after the pandemic and there will be more flights from Southampton.

How can more jets flying possibly be better for the environment?

I don’t expect it to, I just signed it because I agree with it. You’re the one wetting your pants over it.

Yeah because stopping your TV license is going to change everything.

Mental that they disallowed that goal, Son got flicked but he was trying to grab the Utd player at the time.

That would only be the inference if sports events are awarded solely on the basis of a countries record on human rights. If I really need to explain the faults of Russia and China you really are a thick old gammon cunt.

Ndidi should have got a red card then.

I never said that China had a better human rights record than Qatar, you obviously have problems reading.

Not sure what that has got to do with their suitability to host a World Cup. Their human rights record is just one of the reasons why they shouldn’t have been awarded it, in my opinion. i get why sometimes countries like Russia and China get to host these things despite their obvious faults, but the Qatar decision was just illogical and corrupt.