aintforever

There is always going to grey areas whatever the rules. The natural position is obviously open to interpretation but makes sense to stop players trying to block a shot with their arm and getting away with it because they were so close. What doesn't make sense is how Mike Dean still works as a ref. Is there no-one overseeing the standards of refs nowadays, or is he just mates with the right people?

Thank fuck for that.

Not good enough for us though according to the geniuses on here.

Your obsession is a bit weird though mate. It's like deep down you are just as woke as Sadoldgit but unlike him you are scared to express your true self in case you ruin your sad hard-man image. I think deep down you actually love him but because you have to keep taking the piss out or cervixes and taking the knee for the sake of your image you take your frustrations out on him. If you don't like his threads just don't post on them.

Saying Johnson just had a piece of cake is like saying Jimmy Saville was a bit touchy feely. No surprise our resident fuck-wit came out with it. I actually think the best thing for Labour would be to let this shit show carry on for two more years. Things are going to get a lot worse and whoever is in power will have to make some really difficult unpopular decisions. At least whoever gets in power in 2024 might have a chance of things turning around before 2029. Get into office now and they will just have a tidal wave of shit to deal with, Brexit hasn't even been properly sorted out yet.

How the hell can the justify anything other than a GE? The Tory party is a complete mess, whoever they put in charge won't have any sort of mandate.

TWAT

Second half wasn’t great but we got the result that’s all that matters. The players clearly are putting in a shift so the rumours that Ralph has lost the dressing room are clearly bullshit.

Think it’s a mistake not starting Stu Armstrong, I don’t get how the others are keeping their place.

I'm not saying he shouldn't be sacked, just that calling it 'his team' if he is not in control of who is signed or sold is not accurate. If someone else is in charge of signings then they must take part of the blame for the state of our forward line.

If it wasn't him who is in charge of signing players then it is just a fact. If it was Ralph that made the decision to replace Broja and Long with a 18 year old kid who managed to score just 6 goals in the French league then he obviously should be fired.

Probably, especially now that it is clear that Russia’s army is useless.

I watched about a minute of the wanker but couldn’t suffer any more. Other than pointing out that stats compiled by different people may vary is there a point to his video?

She promised a bunch of swivel-eyed tory fuck-wits tax cuts and all rational thought went out the window.

You can guarantee these clowns will make another U-turn on this. What they are doing is not popular already, once people start freezing their nuts off they will really be under pressure.

Three reasons why he will never come here.

Can't see us winning this, wouldn't be surprised with a heavy defeat. If I had to put money on it I would say 2 or 3-0 to Bournemouth. Ralph gone by the weekend.

Plus even though he flaps a bit it’s a big step up from Fraser or McCarthy just standing there rooted.

Thought he was one of the few positives today.

Aribo spent the whole second half just strolling up and down the right, didn’t get back to cover Rice and made little effort to break forward when he had the chance. Lazy cunt. Think it’s win or sack for Ralph now on Weds.

4 points would be a decent return, 3 will probably keep him in a job if the performances are OK. Not confident we will get that though, we look so blunt up front it is scary.

Ed stitching his brother up was definitely a sliding doors moment.

Is Joe Shields the person who thought it was a good idea to blow 70mill on kids instead of buying a proven striker?

But that article didn’t claim it stopped transmission, that’s the point you have missed. It said it COULD reduce transmission based on how previous viruses have behaved. It was crystal clear that they never claimed it had been tested or proven to stop transmission. Politicians and the media have made all sorts of claims but from what I read from the science it was clear all along that the vaccines purpose was to stop serious illness and might help slow the spread.

That is saying exactly what I said, they never claimed to have tested for transmission or said it has been proven to reduce transmission. Just said it COULD do based on how other viruses behave. “As a scientist and from extrapolation of what we have seen so far from other viruses, I would expect a high efficacy in preventing disease translates into at least some efficacy in preventing infection. “I’m very confident that transmission between people will be reduced by such a highly effective vaccine – maybe not 90% but maybe 50%. But we should not forget that even that would result in a dramatic reduction of the pandemic spread.” Şahin said the scientists would have a better understanding of the vaccine candidate’s impact in slowing transmission “in a few months” following further analysis of the antibody response in trial participants. BioNTech has said previously that some crucial questions regarding the jab’s efficacy will only be answerable in the coming weeks and months. Establishing for certain whether it can also stop asymptomatic infections could take up to a year."