Nolan

Jwp won't have lost his professionalism, his passing accuracy or his dead ball skills. If Larin can do it it the Championship, why on earth can't JWP at the same age?

You don't think JWP is intelligent enough to follow Eckerts instructions on style of play?

Let's agree an better way forward. Buying him back would be embarrassing. Let's offer a refund with an additional extra for looking after him.

By the the end of next season all of us could be saying the same thing. For he could be a jolly good Fellows in 26/27

If you're not even going to look to see if it's accurate, probably best not to post a random X post in the first place then 🤷🏼

People are really S#it at spotting fake accounts nowadays... Literally just stick the "name" into Google or bing. If it wasn't obvious that "Martin C'Nwoch" is a completely made up name, a Google search will highlight nothing outside football transfers. And then just search for the profile pictures yes a lot of dodgy profiles use AI to create a profile. But this one uses the picture of a New York Realtor Kraig Hursh. We might be signing Burn on a free, but this made up profile won't know the details.

A good WC won't change the €6 million option to buy figure.

With no fee to pay to a club, a nice sign on fee would make the total monetary value to Stewart the same or more.

Hearts have three chances at being in a European League next season, if they fail to win the Champions League Qualifier, they go to a Europa League Qualifier, If they fail to win the Europa League Qualifier they get a UEFA Conference League Qualifier. Even if Stewart is on a Lower monthly wage, I bet he'll get decent performance bonuses at Hearts

F&&& SaintsExtra, they dont give a S#it about the original content creators they should have just retweeted this:

I think yesterdays statement and todays statements are designed to be two different things. Yesterdays was trying to do what GIbson did before the "trial", to impress to the FA that we have been significantly punished and that any further action would be overkill. Today's is about attempting a reset for the close season and next season.

HR, Sponsorship are just two legal minefields for the club at the moment. its a good thing that the club are finally doing everything to themselves.

i think the person who came up with that was a bit of a

Direct link to the article. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/39252555/southampton-players-tonda-eckert-stay-spygate/

Chorley was put in charge as DIrector of Football at Valenciennes 3 years ago. I seriously wonder if he only was ever under a 3 year contract given the timing. His time at Valenciennes certainly didnt work out and the "restructuring" that occurred moved him to a newly created position of head of UK scouting.

Göztepe flirted with European qualification, arguably, had Ankersen been hands on at Southampton, there may have been someone in the club structure to tell Spors / Eckert (or whoever that was involved) that spying wasn't allowed

the second half of the season was quite enjoyable to be fair, until the tree and the spy stuff. Arguably, if Ankersen had been more involved, given his years in English football, it might not have happened. SR have lots of reason to hold themselves accountable, to conserve the Capital investment in the club.

I think it actually points to the depth of what is going on problem is, who is going to authorise that statement? if Dragan is looking at Parsons, Eckert and Spors, then how does the message cascade to the social media team? in my mind it can only come from Solak and it sounds as if he may be quite busy at the moment.

You can't just get rid of Parsons, Sports and Eckert without having some kind of plan in place to have a structure to buy/sell players and sort a manager. Solaks going to be having a lot of discussions to rescue reputations, and figure out how to reset the club

He has a podcast for legal and chambers matters at www.thelawyer.com.

assertion is this was external to the panel

whoever art the forum ITks' can someone make sure the club know about Simon Jordans assertions

the legally cleanest option for the EFL is to reinstate Southampton You'll only have Gibson complaining, not multiple clubs.

which goes back to the point, if the Knockout competition is being taken on its own, why are previous games not in the same competition being used as aggravating factors.?

the people who wrote the rules badly, the EFL