Sir Ralph

The FA have lost their head over this. 18 month ban I suspect

This hair brain idea has the potential to cause a property crisis which the country cannot afford. 1. This increased cost for housing will be capitalised against values 2. It can cause some to enter into negative equity and increase mortgage costs. Notwithstanding pensioners that are reliant on their property equity to survive their retirement 3. Cue thee potential of a risk of a crisis…. i hope the civil service has somebody in it that can see marginally beyond the objective of the possible policy change to understand the consequences and that Burnham listens https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/council-tax-land-value-downsizing-andy-burnham-b3016870.html

I just feel privileged you engaged with my AI arse for two minutes. You are superior in terms of life experience, intellect and all other counts like the others from your side of thepolitical spectrum. FYI the dismissal of a yougov survey on people’s perception of unions (directly linked to this subject) demonstrates this arrogant nature.

“Can’t be arsed” weird response when you engaged. This will be a surprise to you but a significant portion of the population don’t like unions - see 2022 survey and things won’t have improved. In their modern day format they can be seen as self serving and protectionist but you have benefitted them so of course your view is positive. Your response is arrogant as you aren’t right about everything. My view isn’t based on perception but “I can’t be arsed” https://yougov.com/en-gb/articles/44616-trade-unions-seen-more-negatively-following-2022s-

So you want to know why I have my views but won’t explain your background. As a union member you have benefitted from their protection so of course you like them. Also I don’t want employment laws back in the Victorian times but I also don’t like the union protection of employees and parts of business that, for example, may be inefficient.

Were you a union member in the private or public sector? I explained earlier why some employers may have a negative view of unions. That view isn’t exactly ground breaking and would be a common view in many private sector businesses. I know senior people in the public sector who also do not like the unions. In addition to what I mentioned above, unions sometimes create increased restriction around employment and business functions. This makes the workplace less competitive and actually reduces business growth and the potential to operate more efficiency thereby creating more jobs. This is a reflection of some unions that have a socialist mindset whilst trying to operate within a capitalist system.

Thats your opinion regarding “sensible employers attitudes” as it’s mine about unions. Have you been part of a union before?

Unions in principle can be good if they are being reasonable with employers and I can see a place for them when you have significant numbers of employees with standardised pay. Over recent years in respect of some industries (for example rail and train) unions have a bad reputation of overplaying their hand and trying to secure unreasonable terms for their members. When I was younger I worked in a place that had union employees and my experience was that the reps were the work shy ones who used their membership to protect themselves. It could have negative connotations because unions can reduce flexibility in managing staff for business and create the potential for industrial action and, in some circumstances, more adversarial relationships between employees and employers. This can be a problem for some businesses as it can slow decision making particularly when margins are tight.

In most businesses I think people would not want to be a member of a union because of the negative connotations, hence why they don’t thrive in those environments. I don’t hold out much hope for improvement but at least he doesn’t look like he is going to appoint Red Ed as chancellor

I wouldn’t have said some of the things she did. However I think we should be looking as well about how she treated others. Those that knew her, including those from the gay community, have only said positive things. To me that’s says a lot about someone’s character.

The difference is that I think your threshold for what a “c bomb” is or a “facist” is lower than a lot of people, particularly people who disagree with you. It’s about tolerance of an alternative viewpoint without getting abusive. Anyway we all agree it’s a sad state of affairs that people with different political views are being attacked

And I quote (following various rants calling me a c bomb plus other things)…..I’m “evil” for my view on the 2 child benefit cap. You’re Easily offended so your reaction to Widdecombe isn’t surprising “Mate, you would prefer kids to be in poverty than to allow people child benefit for if they have more than 2 kids, and as the above studies prove, child poverty causes child deaths. That's bordering on evil, so don't you dare try to take the high road.”

Whilst she, for example, voted against certain proposed LGBT… legislation that doesn’t make somebody a homophobe. How do you square off the fact that she was friends with a number of gay celebrities as outlined above who have come out in support of her? You can disagree with something and not be racist, homophobic, etc. it’s how you treat the individual - you should read @trousers copy and paste above it nails it You did label me a child killer because I disagreed with the removal of the two child welfare cap. so if that’s the standard for calling someone that, you are too easily offended by people that you don’t agree with

Whilst she, for example, voted against certain proposed LGBT… legislation that doesn’t make somebody a homophobe. How do you square off the fact that she was friends with a number of gay celebrities as outlined above who have come out in support of her? You literally labelled me a child killer because I disagreed with the removal of the two child welfare cap so your standard for offence generally is a very low bar

Th bizarre thing about this is why were the police so keen to push this idea that the attack wasn’t politically motivated? The bloke drove 4 hours from Rotherham than morning. Not exactly a speculative burglary. Doesn’t add up.