Sir Ralph

Agree to disagree

They are relevant because if you have never taken risks to make your business work, worked regularly till the early hours, already pay substantial sums in tax then you don’t have a clue. Based on your lack of willing to explain your work I suspect you have done none of these so you’re happy for people like me to have done this (at their own time and detriment in some cases) to then pay taxes and then call them selfish if they say this isn’t fair. I don’t have any issues with people that make lifestyle choices to work the 9-5 etc, in fact it maybe the more sensible choice. But if you do that don’t then criticise people who have pushed harder for complaining about ever increasing tax burdens. All very selfish. Do you think money grows on trees - most people have worked bloody hard and taken lots of risks just to hand it over to a wasteful government, who themselves have no idea how business works. Notwithstanding this it’s a stupid approach as it decreases aspiration and the people who already pay most tax to continue to aspire. Hence less tax for the Governemnt. You may not understand this concept though. An uncomfortable truth for you is that the top 1% of earners pay 30% of income tax and the top 10% pay 60% of income tax.

Rather a stupid statement. What do you do in terms of sector work? I like to know as it helps to inform why people take the views they do.

So today will be the day where the socialist party starts to really show their true colours. Down with aspiration and wealth, up with state reliance and wastage. All because of what happened in WW2 or something. Never had anything handed to me on a plate but Im about to get my pants pulled down (again) for no other reason than I work harder than the majority of my contemporaries. Welcome to socialist Britain Anyway at least we probably won’t see them again until I’ve retired

Thats correct - I'm a rabid racist. Anyone like me and hypochondriac is.

Not if he wasnt putting the effort in. I would be on his back explaining that he was throwing away the last 12-15 years of hard work and needed to remind himself of how he got here. You are responsible for your own actions on the pitch.

Those that have been here over at least the last 2-3 seasons are likely to be part of the problem and need to go, barring a couple who try

But he doesnt try and win headers, gets pushed off the ball, doesnt move, etc. I get you can look lethargic but if you give up on challenging for the ball isnt that just being lazy? Thats my problem with him. Play badly but at least put yourself about

There is a difference between a lack of confidence and not trying.

The players are the problem. Why would we appoint somebody they want? F them.

It needs someone who is going to stamp their authority on this group of mentally weak and pathetic players. If they dont want to do what the manager says then freeze them out. No more putting arms around shoulders. Man up and play or spend the year in the U21s. On the Total Saints Podcasts they used the word 'cowards' for the players and that is what they are.

He is so arrogant and full of hot air. The most annoying bit is the way he runs his hand through his hair during interviews.......gives me cold sweats

Lets get Pardew back instead then 😂

Yes I’m not sure why I thought that….

Lets see what the final motive is. I suspected it was an Islamic radical to be honest based on the initial reports, which isnt really very surprising with recent history.

They might realise that the first time he steps out from the reaction.

Dave Challinor

Basically he would need to become a better manager😆

Great hair

This is giving me shivers

In my opinion, thats not a good enough reason for not intervening here and trying to destroy their structures to at least reduce their capacity to kill, rape and harm. It may not solve everything but it should make it much more difficult for them

I don’t want to upset you but most politicians at senior levels do, even the ones you like. I can’t see what would be selfish about this though so when there is evidence I would be happy to agree with you. Until then it’s speculation

It’s not speculative because he is starting to action it. If you read the article he’s putting political pressure so I’m crediting his work to date. Obviously if he doesn’t follow through then no. The use of the word speculation is based on something with little or no information or evidence

At the moment I would personally take that to get some stability.

Personally I think O’Neill would be a good shout