I understood there can be exceptions to the 14 day rule though, and figured this was classed as an exception hence they expedited it.
Not that I agree with it btw, and also to only have <24 to mount an appeal again I am not sure is legal.
It also shows he does well against teams we expect to beat but crumble when we come up against better teams.
those game we lost, I think were teams that pressed us harder (other than Oxford where we alerted awful).
We are in the Championship, not Champions League.
I think there are more important positions to fill first, like wingers and creativity, and if time/money left and we can recruit better than what we have, then sure, but clearly isn’t the priority.
Agree with this, but is isnt only that we play with a way that highlights our inadequacies - even teams with far far better players than ours dont try to do this to the extent we do. There is a solid reason they dont do it also - that it gives up chances and goals.
Not sure that is correct. As in, Martin and the staff wouldnt get 100% of their payout in a lump sum, they would surely get in monthly until the end of the contract or until they got another job.
Whilst I strongly disagree, I'm not sure we are sacking him anytime soon.
I for one wont watch another game while he is here, in the ground or on TV.