Weston Super Saint

Once you accept weird Gio is a wind up, sentences like this one become hilarious! Top trolling.

Nor sure he even had one? Guy Gibson on the other hand...

According to Farmer Giles :

Ah bless you. You took me off your 'ignore' list so you could directly quote my post. Are you Soggy in disguise?

(c) - when you claimed we are creating a 'football super power' this season? No one is 'making up lying shit' just reading your bat shit crazy posts, pointing and laughing at you.

Lol. Wait for the meltdown when he discovers the charges mysteriously disappear.

If you have to ask, you are not worthy of Russball.

I suspect Soggy's got a hard on because his name is Braverman.

No it hasn't. You've been called an anti semite, but I don't recall anyone else being labelled the same. I wonder if that is because of all your anti semitic posts?

Worse than that... He wouldn't be able to just quit / walk away from his contract without incurring a financial penalty - otherwise there would have been no issues when he walked away from Swansea to join us....

No hair. No beard. Wears tracksuits. Doesn't vape like a cunt. I'm out.

Half marathon completed this week on the rower - 21,097m in 1:29:58. The last 5k were horrendous trying to keep the average under 2:08 per 500m to hit the sub 90 minute mark! 10k's are now down to below 42 mins consistently with my best at 41:14.

This is our 'attacking' one.

Football superpower legacy right fucking there. Things can't get better than that.

You're going to shit your pants when you realise that definition can also apply to the current Labour Govt as well as the previous Tory one. The rest of us have managed to figure out what a stonking majority means.

A 'football superpower legacy'. Jesus wept 🤦‍♂️

Good grief no, otherwise Boris wouldn't have had a sniff.

We've seen them play in games?

Maybe a follow up question would be - how has Rachel Levine managed to father two children?

To be fair, Hamas do have some pretty atrocious ethics, so a bit of 'ethic cleansing' is probably a good thing.

I've highlighted a word that might help you out.

I can confirm he has no idea. Anyone elected that he doesn't like is a far right Nazi sympathiser that got there by hoodwinking people.

Sure, that makes sense. Spend this year's transfer fees on next year's players for the Championship. Great plan. I think you've also forgotten about the 'scar' tissue they will all gain during the relegation - something that Russell was keen to make sure no one had when we signed them this summer. Makes sense to sign them without scar tissue, just so they can gain some of our own! Now explain why we spent upto £25m on Ramsdale, plus what, £100k per week, when we could have just put McCarthy between the sticks with Lis as back up and saved millions. That makes no sense at all, unless you sign him with the hope he will be good enough to keep the team up, whilst hoping the other signings come good. Talk about re-writing history to make it look like we have some sort of coherent plan!

Just to clarify, you're now saying (and saying it as if it was definitely true and there could be no other possibilites!), that the only reason we signed Archer and BBD was so they would be great for us NEXT season in the Championship? Despite PSR constraints that you've been parrotting for the last 3 months, the club decided the BEST thing they could possibly do was spend this year's transfer allocation and an entire years worth of wages on not one, but two players who will be useless for us this season, but absolute blinders for us next season. This also means that the club entered the summer transfer window being 100% certain that we would be relegated (which makes the signing of AR look fucking weird, especially given 'PSR innit'). I imagine asking you for a source for this will be fruitless. I also imagine you've made it up to suit your narrative. You don't half make up some absolute bullshit.

Does that mean that Farmer Giles has made up a load of old bollocks about the clubs finances. Again? He wouldn't do that twice would he?