Holmes_and_Watson

Ah, who needs athleticism, height, power and pace, when you have....um...what is it we have, again? 🙂

Did Hoddle have his views on past lives, before he joined us? Or did he just spend time here, and reach the obvious conclusion. 🙂

No. I somehow manage not to be a twat here or elsewhere. Quiet, the rest of you. 🙂 Why you have to be at all, is baffling.

I was going to move on. But wanted to just ask that you consider lines like that. You have no idea who on the forum has autism or who cares/ supports others who do in whatever capacity. It's a definite example of why you, by your own admission, "come across as a twat".

A disappointing evening for those who picked "imbecile" as MLG has confirmed "twat" 🙂 Suggestion: Have a go at talking to the people here, in the same way you talk to people elsewhere.

At no point did I say they didn't. You made the statement that the one presented here didn't work on any level. It seems a natural query to one who is very literal minded when it suits, to ask how the posted analogy failed at all of those levels. Sadly, you've just given some levels of analogy, and not how they apply here. Once again, you are a disappointment. I'm beginning to think you really didn't check at all, then rushed off to find a page about analogies. Perhaps you'll do better once you've answered trousers, or cleared up the evidence of you editing posts to change their meaning, after people have responded/reacted. It wouldn't do, to be a "dishonest troll" after all.

Thanks egg. I was going to find your post saying this earlier. MLG posts. MLG gets a response/ reaction showing him to be wrong/an imbecile/both MLG goes back and edits his post. MLG then pretends that the edited version is the only reality, as that's what he meant all along. Your section long "typo" was from today. The editing post was the one egg is referring to. My post said:- And I noticed that you've not learned about editing your posts to try and change their meaning. You got caught out on this thread doing it [when you asked what was wrong with intolerance], and you've been editing away again [the post where you've added a section]. I see your argument has shifted away from the "no, I didn't" section and into the "so, what if I did" one. Tragic. It's all there for anyone who wants a laugh at your childishness. A number were laughing at you, at the time. So, since it was someone else who posted those, and you mistakenly are blaming me for starting it, I guess I can't be "stalking you across threads" then, either. Because anyone doing that would need a shovel, like the guy cleaning up after the elephant on Blue Peter.

No. You said "analogy doesn't work on any level." You've shown nothing to prove that you, happy to nitpick others, has done even the most basic of checks on the levels of analogy, and how they apply in this instance. Which is probably why everyone else knows you're wrong again.

That's quite a typo. Your original post said:- 1) No one in this thread had posted that link. The link was relevant to a post in this thread that it was replying to. 2) Do you read every single new post in every thread before making your next post each time? The response to those points was:- ) Utterly predictable. Never mind that the same information has been given. If you can say the same thing, from another source, you think it's breaking news. You've been peddling that nonsense for any number of transfer threads, where you just *had* to be seen to give the news. Like a man-child on X (sorry, you'd call it twitter), you've given up in a sulk when others kept getting in ahead of you. 2) As I'm here most days, yes, I generally do. There's not that much to catch up on, if visits are regular. If it's a discussion, then definitely, as it's just courtesy to the other posters, to know their views. But then, I don't set out to undercut other posters. That's what people would have seen, and the thread moved on. But look! Later on, the world's biggest "typo" has added a whole new section! 1) No one in this thread had posted that link. The link was relevant to a post in this thread that it was replying to. 2) Do you read every single new post in every thread before making your next post each time? 3) "We all knew about it" Even if your answer to 2 is yes, do you really believe everyone else does? 4) Had anyone else on this forum made that post, would you reply to it? I guess you will come up with a reason why only me, but 1 to 3 shows why you are wrong. Edited 6 hours ago by Matthew Le God Caught out again. Someone described you as "tragic" which seems a good fit.

It was @Paul Chuckle who posted your FM guides, and your feelings regarding stadium names. You then made the choice to pretend you meant something else, admit lying to your readers, blame other thread creators and then blame SI. I forget if that was when you went off in a sulk, as we were laughing at your desperate deflection so much. That thread stays in my mind because it could easily have turned out completely different. You just had to dig yourself a hole. When you put us all on ignore, you won't have to see any of our responses. Using ignore was your suggestion. "No excuse not to" use it. No answer for trousers? No list of why analogies work? I think that's just this page. Undoubtedly more things you've gone quiet on.

I was about to respond, to save you have to score that off your list. But I see egg has already begun to point out why you are not only wrong yet again, why you don't understand it, and importantly why, like so many things in life, it's likely to remain beyond you. While I'm here though, don't forget to answer trousers. And I noticed that you've not learned about editing your posts to try and change their meaning. You got caught out on this thread doing it, and you've been editing away again.

Could you provide a list of all the levels on which an analogy is supposed to work, please? Then illustrate why it doesn't work on "any" of them? Obviously, you've already checked, before being able to make that statement. It seemed appropriate enough to me.

No way. He'd already have forseen us lose all our games, leading to really gloomy press conferences. "Sure, I can perform miracles. But getting a PL team out of this lot?" 🙂

As I pick myself up, and dust myself down, I look back to the start to see you've glued yourself to the starting blocks...again. I can hear you cry "it's not my fault! It's never my fault!" Don't forget to answer trousers' question. I had you down as being both. At least trousers is giving you a choice.

For someone who trots out that they want a debate, as one reason for nonsense posts, you're incredibly quick to not want a challenge. Why should people choose not to engage, so that you can continue with your many poor posting habits? Why should you be indulged, to continue to deliberately undermine other posters and threads? Ignoring your posts doesn't work. It just encourages you to do the same things on more threads, dragging them down. The first 2 posts I saw from you today, after your many recent embarrassments, had you being a bell end, and undercutting other posters. About the most complimentary thing someone said about you recently was along the lines of "It's not too bad if you don't engage with him." Just try not to interact with, or feed, the troll, and walk on eggshells through the threads where he's having his tantrums. Or hey, why not do something about the troll? Perhaps if you were less of an infant, you would have learned to play with the rest of us. Or at least learned something along the way. But you're pretty much the same as when you joined. You've just had long periods where people put up with it. Perhaps, if you can't learn, can't be challenged, but have to post, you can have an ever increasing ignore list of your own. That way, you can have your incorrect "gotcha" posts, and never see the rubbish in them called out. Everyone would also benefit, as you'd then not spend a dozen posts in those threads, digging yourself a hole. C'mon Matt, apparently there's "no excuse not to."

1) Utterly predictable. Never mind that the same information has been given. If you can say the same thing, from another source, you think it's breaking news. You've been peddling that nonsense for any number of transfer threads, where you just *had* to be seen to give the news. Like a man-child on X (sorry, you'd call it twitter), you've given up in a sulk when others kept getting in ahead of you. 2) As I'm here most days, yes, I generally do. There's not that much to catch up on, if visits are regular. If it's a discussion, then definitely, as it's just courtesy to the other posters, to know their views. But then, I don't set out to undercut other posters.

Translation

The accordion player is only there, playing that, to give Saints fans a send off as they jump off the bridge. 🙂

The worlds of cosplay and sci-fi conventions are there for you. 🙂

While he is, Middlewordie's post easily applies to players currently playing in League 1. While he's played for QPR across recent seasons, the majority of Kelman's games have been on loan in leagues 1 and 2. Any reasonable poster would see that Matt. You're 0 for 2 this morning. Following yesterday's 0 in dozens of posts, it's maybe a good time to pause and think.

Yes. We all knew about it, because it was posted already. Do read the threads. Matt, even in your haste to satisfy your stadium related fetish. I'd not have bothered, but you're being an idiot elsewhere already today, after your embarrassment in the Lounge yesterday.

SaintsWeb tradition is that I now throw abuse at your eyebrow for being an ITK tease. Then follow it up, by questioning the source of your eyebrow's claims, and disparage gossip it picked up while being waxed at a salon. 🙂

Thanks for your summary and that excellent, spot on, article. I try to be a bit tactful, watching from afar. You have a club with engaged, if flawed decision makers. The position is not where anyone wants to be, but there are plenty of opportunities for players to stake a claim and go up with the club. It's not everyone, but there are a number of apathetic, mediocre players drifting their way through this season. Why they don't grasp the opportunity is a mystery. If that's their level, or they deluded themselves into thinking they should be somewhere else, that's on SR's recruitment and coaching. Oh, for a manager that gives them some home truths and a right kick up the rear. At least you'd see some intensity and increased effort.

Nathan Jones right once again. Playing against 10 is harder. Only a few mins after Le Mans were down to 10, and they got the only goal. That was quite late on and VA had no answer. I was beginning to think a warrant would be put out for the thieves who had pinched everyone's shooting boots. Most of the few chances were blazed over. VA did get a 1 on 1 fairly close to the keeper that was saved. Some running up and down the middle, followed by poor passing was the order of the evening. VA will be very disappointed about the marking for the goal. But they hadn't done anything of note to get more than a draw.

I hope this the case. Keeping him would be a start to having a team that can stay up. Just need to look at 8 or 9 of the others for next time. Bah! I didn't get time to enjoy Saint86's post at all. 🙂