Scudamore

er

He doesn't need to be good enough for the Prem. He will be playing in the Championship (where we know he is good) for one of our relegation rivals...

Whatever floats your boat i guess...

Skysports Transfer Deadline page: 11.16 Stoke City are poised to sign Wigan striker Henri Camara on loan until the end of the season while defender Andrew Davies looks set to join Norwich on loan They can f::ck right off with that one...

Mong. You didn't go to games when you did live in the country... And i don't need an excuse to not go to the game. But if i were at the game i would be in the pub prior to the game. Not because i am a "luvvie" but because i just don't think it would actually achieve anything...whereas drinking beer always achieves something...

If I were a rich man, Ya ha deedle deedle, bubba bubba deedle deedle dum. All day long I'd biddy biddy bum. If I were a wealthy man. I wouldn't have to work hard. Ya ha deedle deedle, bubba bubba deedle deedle dum. If I were a biddy biddy rich, Yidle-diddle-didle-didle man. Oi vey...

You couldn't care less because you don't go to games and as such it's not ruining your enjoyment of the game...

So did Steve Claridge. A hex on him.

Same font. Italicised. And if you really can't work this one out for yourself then there is no hope for you alpine...

What about this one? Brett attempting Blue Steel...

Of course the point i meant to make is there is categorising and then there is categorising...

Still is...

They're not afraid to shy away from sh:t storylines...

I could be categorised into the not liking Marmite group...

Once again not categorisation. He said you. Not your type or the likes of you... You are trying to read what you would like to be there...

I meant as in an anti-Lowe comment. Not a comment coming from a group of people considered to be anti-Lowe's. You have read something into my post that simply wasn't there i'm afraid... But...and i feel i must reiterate this point...i am not a "luvvie" which by the way seem like insult lite... If you want to call me a c::nt plough on...i promise not to report you...

Without me you'd be allowed to plough on regardless being silly though...i'm trying to help you alpine... You could try thanking me from time to time...but i guess that's asking too much...

Molyneux leaft back. Skacel left wing. Ain't gonna happen though.

Yeah period actually means full stop. Full stop.

But...i don't defend the regime...you appear to have lumped me in with other people...thus the categorisation comment... I do however like pointing out when people are being silly and trying to cram one ridiculous anti-Lowe accusation into yet another thread...especially the plainly not true ones...like "Lowe ate my hamster" Not the same thing as defending at all...

And you have nothihg to offer other than name calling and categorising of people...it's kind of lame...

Non-plussed?

How is what i've said delusional? You throw words like that out and i'm sure you don't know what they mean... It's not delusional...it's my memory of events... Oh and like nick i really must reach for that report button for your insults have hurt my feelings... So you admit you were wrong Never demanded his removal no...made constant remarks for weeks on end about him being no good however... You made it clear when it became apparent that there was no chance of it happening yes...because you love to get upset about things and need someone to be your point of anger...Crouch and Pearson weren't a double act...and Crouch isn't a mastermind for bringing Pearson in...and neither is Pearson the management god that he is portrayed as on here... Although after the final game of the season I wanted him to stay of course...i couldn't have given two sh:ts what happened to Crouch however...so please don't lump the two in as a package... *yawn* Commendable stuff. You are quite the super fan for not demanding a managers removal after a crap result. You truely are a one trick pony of negativity. So utterly, utterly tiresome it pains me. I probably wouldn't find your u-turn so amusing were it not for the fact that your views are never expresses quite so placidly as you like to remember them after the event. Crouch is an idiot. To Crouch is the only way forward. Perhaps it's because you simply want what you can't have? Ie. a f::cking clue...

Indeed...and it's really quite easy to read i must say...gawd bless Cmardibge Uinervtisy. However...this is unforgivable: "With 17 games left we can't afford to lose the 50% of games we have, we must win more then we lose or were be down for sure." Even with an apostrophe that would be "we are be down for sure" which if you were a famer would have a certain charm....but i'm guessing you're not... The apostrophe fills in those missing letters is how to remember... I should be a teacher...but i hate kids...

There's been a few comments from Wotte thusfar that have led me to believe he's actually quite switched on...this despite my initial thoughts that his appointment is leading us down poo creek sans paddle...Boothroyd would have been nice...but is/was unlikely... Oh and Marco you really need to get a grip on this whole... were we're - we are we'll - we will ...thing. Someone else pointed it out the other day and you're still doing it.