buctootim

She was the leader and gave it up, presumably her choice - she has a youngish family. .

You were better looking than I imagined.

You're above me and we're both behind Bateman who told Lou she was a bloke in drag. I dont think we're in the inner circle of trust.

I dont disagree with that - but I think thats a different situation to this one. Neither had money when the child was growing up and had no track record of earning any - so its hard to claim the mother was disadvantaged. The father's business didnt start until the son was 14 and likely didnt make much money until he was 18 at least. Where is the loss for the mother that would justify a claim?

Crisps are fried potatoes ffs. Whats with the corn snack liberals?

But they were both poor when the child was growing up. The whole principle of retrospective action is wrong imo. Should the state claim back benefits / tuition fees / costs of healthcare / education etc from people who later get rich or win the lottery?

Their son was born in 1981 and he didnt start his business until 1995.

Four of those are corn or similar cereal based snacks.

Southern (tv)

Im in a similar position.

I know not all cases are as clear cut, but this one is ridiculous. They were married for three years when he was 20 and they lived on benefits. They split up 30 years ago and she divorced him 20 years ago. The money was only made after divorce. Bizarre.

I hesitated about posting this up because of some the posts on the sexism and racism threads - but its an important issue imo. The Supreme Court have ruled that ex spouses can claim for a slice of their former partners waelth even if it was earned years after they split up. I understand the ruling that stay at home partners should share in wealth earned by spouses during the marriage and also that children should benefit - but why the fu ck should someone who divorced 20 years ago be entitled to a share of money their ex has subsequently earned through skill and graft with no input from them? Total injustice imo (and yes I have a lazy grasping ex who thinks I should pay for her four holidays a year). I had thought things were changing with a judge telling an ex spouse in February to 'get a job'. I guess not. This will just speed the gradual decline of marriage imo. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-22450272 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-31832392

Its going to be a total lottery - decided by whichever parties' supporters are more disenchanted. Much of Labour's vote will stay home, Tories will switch to UKIP and defecting LD voters will decide who gets in.

http://www.enjoygram.com/noahliebherr

What?

Me too. I love Italian food.

My mum used to have a timeshare cottage on the IoW. Its the same principle yeah?

Tom

Im liking 2015..

You're just trying to set me up for a car crash so you can watch you little scamp.

No idea if Beverly Allit the nurse who killed four kids and injured four more was a psychopath or not, but a friend used to work at Rampton. He said her room / cell was like a small childs room complete with fluffy toys and dolls on the pink bed

Would be even funnier if he turned up and they started singing GYTOFTG

Classsic Pap freakery. You dig around on the net to find some four year old Guardian profile and extrapolate out from that a whole lifestyle. About as accurate as your twin towers slpastick. You're too deficient to even realise it was a self deprecating joke about the dancing guy

Do you want to go to a party Ive been invited to in California?