Jump to content

trousers

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    57,758
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by trousers

  1. @NabilHassan79: Few more highlights. Portpin understands that the administrators are satisfied with the terms of the Keith Harris bid. #pompey @NabilHassan79: Portpin say threat of withdrawal of 'golden share' by Football League if another bid is put forward for approval is against insolvency law.
  2. @NabilHassan79: Portpin: "We are calling on Chairman Greg Clarke to commit publically to the Football League reviewing any bid that's put to it for approval by the administrators. If Mr. Clarke fails to provide everyone with the certainty that's needed on this issue, the Football League will have no option but to accept its share of the responsibility for the damage that could be caused to #pompey, its creditors."
  3. @NabilHassan79: 1) Portpin asking for further Football League clarification on "no other bid". Believe it's "unlawful" and leaves them open to legal damages @NabilHassan79: 2) Portpin cite recent example of Swindon takeover in argument to Football League statement that there is not time to seal new deal. #pompey @NabilHassan79: 3) Portpin say Football League have left itself exposed to legal action for damages from creditors which could amount to millions of pounds. @NabilHassan79: 4) Portpin ask League to consider Keith Harris which they believe offers a better deal for creditors and earns them £6.3m for Fratton Park.
  4. Popcorn at the ready... @NabilHassan79: Just been issued a statement from Portpin, will tweet the key points now but it's pretty explosive stuff. #pompey
  5. His Twitter feed looks intact to me.... https://twitter.com/MatthewLeGod
  6. http://www.pkf.co.uk/web/pkf.nsf/00F0EE29247BAB1480257B190035B736/$file/Signed+Progress+Report+170812+to+020113.PDF Does that tell us anything we didn't already know about the distribution of the parachute payments?
  7. Oops....yep, that's what I meant....sorry, Pompey maths in reverse there! Still, £776k of unpaid legal fees is still a sizeable chunk to come out of the coffers....
  8. http://www.pkf.co.uk/web/pkf.nsf/00F0EE29247BAB1480257B190035B736/$file/Signed+Progress+Report+170812+to+020113.PDF Am I reading that correctly? £776m in unpaid legal fees..?
  9. http://www.pkf.co.uk/web/pkf.nsf/00F0EE29247BAB1480257B190035B736/$file/Signed+Progress+Report+170812+to+020113.PDF Every little helps....
  10. Clarification of the reasoning behind the court case in January's report (answers some recent queries on this on this thread I believe): http://www.pkf.co.uk/web/pkf.nsf/00F0EE29247BAB1480257B190035B736/$file/Signed+Progress+Report+170812+to+020113.PDF Sale of the Company's business and assets 5.3 Creditors will recall that at the time of the First Progress Report, it was hoped that as sale of the Company's business and trade assets would be completed to either Portpin or PST. Unfortunately, to date, neither party has been in a position to complete its desired acquisition of the Club. 5.4 In the case of Portpin, the Football League has advised the Administrators that it has not received all of the information it has requested of Portpin, in order for it to give the necessary sanction to any sale. 5.5 In the case of the PST, the sale of the Club to PST is contingent on the inclusion (in the sale) of the Club's ground, commonly known as Fratton Park, which is the subject of purported debenture security in favour of Portpin. 5.6 There being no other parties capable of completing a purchase of the Company's business and assets, on 16 November 2012, the Joint Administrators made an application to the High Court under Paragraph 71 of Schedule B1 of the Act requesting that the Company's assets be sold as if they were not subject to Portpin's purported security. A hearing was listed for an expedited two day trial to take place on 13 and 14 December 2012. On the afternoon prior to the hearing R Estates changed material terms for the acquisition of the Property, in particular, the dates of completion. The Joint Administrators were left with no option but to seek an adjournment to enable them to take stock. The hearing has therefore been adjourned until 15 January 2013 and negotiations between the parties continue.
  11. Hang on one cotton pickin' minute..... Birch has been running a loss making company whilst in administration? Isn't that illegal....?
  12. First game of next season: Saints v Bournemouth (NPower Championship)
  13. 90,000? (very rough guess...300x300 ft) Edit: which, coincidently, comes to £11,250,000 Now, where have I seen that figure before?!
  14. Need a bigger stadium FFS!!
  15. The judge has already shown sympathy (bias??) towards the Trust's bid by setting a "latest date" of 19th April. In one of the press releases yesterday it was stated that the natural course of things (if Pompey were a "normal" company ) would have been a date later in the spring or even early summer. So, given the judge is seemingly bending over backwards to help the club survive (under Trust plans), indicates to me that he's got his eye on an outcome that is sympathetic to the Trust's bid. Lots of reading between the ones there but the judge had the opportunity yesterday to treat Pompey the same way he'd treat any other company but he chose not to... I'm therefore expecting the judge to rule in favour of Portpin's charge being diluted to £3m. What happens then is anyone's guess...?
  16. Even Mr Ho concurred with the content of the article. I never thought I'd live to see the day where a Pompey fan admitted their FA Cup win (and other hollow victories) were based on unsustainable finances and "fraudulent" support of said practices. Time to get the "they get it after all" bunting out perhaps?
  17. Ssssshhhhh..... Most of the stuff posted on here is second hand in the first place...
  18. "Opportunity is what you make of your life not what others do for you" - Bobby Davro, 1983
  19. Disappointing that they didn't choose one of your posts to publish Turkish. Biased numpties the lot of them
  20. http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/1537832-mauricio-pochettino-has-the-new-southampton-manager-won-over-the-fans
  21. That article is inaccurate nonsense...it calls Allen "a journalist"...
  22. Never any doubt...
  23. Yep - that looked nasty on TV. Kept them in the game with some superb saves
×
×
  • Create New...