Jump to content

trousers

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    57,698
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by trousers

  1. Charlton haven't had a Sundance
  2. Dilema for Pards at half-time? Maybe looking to rest one or two but one goal cushion not enough?
  3. Charlton haven't got a Scooby
  4. I love this league. Will be a shame to get promoted
  5. how thye f*** did that stay out!
  6. If we don't win every remaining game this season (exclusing FA Cup) I'll eat a badger
  7. Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhh
  8. Hammond captain....? Sign of things to come?
  9. Working ok here....if a bit stuttery
  10. Funny you should mention that....just got the scanner down and there was the unsigned Paul Allen/Vulcan contract from 2007. No wonder it fell through. Tsk....Me and my shoddy housekeeping. Still, a lucky escape I reckon....these American owners can be very unreliable....
  11. One in Shirley, surely?
  12. Some of us don't like to boost Rupert Murdoch's pension fund....
  13. What, and have to socialise with other people?
  14. Anyone fancy scanning a copy of the letter and posting it so that those of us who haven't got one can make an objective comment on how professional it looked? I've got a scanner in my loft but, alas, no letter.
  15. I've a general question about the administration industry and not about the administration of Southampton leisure holdings so advance apologies for posting it on this thread. Are administrators allowed to engage 'ghost' consortium(s) as a tool in their armoury to raise the stakes with 'real' bidders or would that be against the rules? (morally or legally). As I say, not related to this case at all. Just idol curiosity.
  16. Don't recall. Just lurking I think
  17. He was logged in last week
  18. That
  19. Superb news
  20. Not quite. He's Ken Tointon. Or maybe not.
  21. Lol moment :-)
  22. I was wondering that too but the wording on the letter suggests that it applies to all shareholders: "Please be advised that there are insufficient assets in this matter to enable any distribution to shareholders." Although, arguably, it may have been better to have said: ".....distribution to any shareholders" ?
  23. Speaking generally, poor practice and good outcomes aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. Good outcomes can also happen through luck and circumstances rather than just through skill and experience. Granted, good outcomes are probably more likely with the latter than the former.
×
×
  • Create New...