trousers

Working now...

.............. Link hangs....

They would be daft to do so this side of Christmas

"IMHO". Less of the 'young' please. I have a mature and wise head on these here shoulders.....IMHO of course

Unless one of Lowe's contractual conditions for selling his shares is that any new owners adopt his 'youth' strategy and see it through until at least the January transfer window. Either way, any new owners would be foolish to impose change on the shop floor in the short term and no doubt they, if they exist, are more than aware of that. So, no need to worry about a lack of continuity IF we get new owners and/or investment in the immediate future. IMHO of course

Being reminded in one thread how strong 50%+ of the sides in this division look on paper has diluted my optimism somewhat!

I was just thinking the same.....which begs the question....what did you guys talk about for 3+ hours....?!

Wouldn't that reinforce the 'reverse psychology theory though...? i.e. a 'loose canon' praising the so called 'bad guy' and slagging off the so called 'good guy' would get get more people on the side of the 'good guy' than the 'bad guy'....? Could just be me thinking too hard again of course....

So...does this latest Fulthorpe 'revelation' confirm that the likes of Sundance Beast were representatives of a Fulthorpe PR company instructed to come on here to appear pro-Lowe, but in an extreme fashion, so that they would turn more people against Lowe in a reverse psychology style manoeuvre...? Perhaps

He hasn't been watching either....perhaps he has something better going on in his life than watching TSW threads? Can't imagine what though....

Somewhat surprising that Morph hasn't commented on this thread yet....hmmmm....

Who?

Who?

A 5 - 1 defeat would be worse. IMHO

Back

Out to lunch for a couple of hours. No one post any more on this until I return. Thanks for your cooperation

Did NAMG and Tricon also have a table ?

NAMG mkII ?

....

FFS...will people PLEASE refrain from breaking new takeover news when I'm not around. Thank you

It's closer to Monday than Friday. (Fact rather than an honest opinion, of course)

Ah....but if it was you, wouldn't you have posted the same reply to put me off the scent...? Can't catch wily old Trousers out that easily....

But wouldn't the 'relevant authorities' investigate a doubling of share price 'overnight' as 'potentially suspicious' regardless of whether the company in question brings it to their attention or not? Surely that's the whole remit of the Takeover Panel and the like.....they wouldn't be a very effective policing body if they relied on tip offs from the very company whose share activity they are duty bound to ensure is above board.....would they? Who knows? (indeed....who does know....?) Either there has been 'wrong doing' or there hasn't.....perhaps I should give the old bill a call now to bring it to their attention? Unless of course PA, or his representatives, were in the loop all along.... cheers

Maggie Philbin (obviously)

In accordance with the 'Sale of Goods and Services Act' and the 'Trades Descriptions Act', did we ever get a refund from Seymour Pierce? (Genuine Question)