I know I'll be accused of being a government apologist, or such like, for even asking, but is it actually "government policy" to "stop all benefits" regardless of the reason for missing a JCP appointment or could this be a case of over zealous (jobsworth) implementation of a policy that actually has more scope for discretion than the headlines suggest? I've not seen the actual wording of the policy so genuine question. (no doubt there's a link somewhere that I've been too lazy to click on)