Matthew Le God

What do you have against their players that warrants such a ridiculous wish?

When you say "they", do you mean one person?

Like a Monty Python sketch... Things would be very different if Will Salt watched this video before his trip...

Eyewitness testimonial isn't reliable minutes after an event. Let alone recalling things from weeks or months earlier and remembering faces. As this video shows... Would you recognise someone you saw 2 months ago who was stood outside your workplace?

Witness statements - They didn't report them at the time. ID lineups aren't overly reliable within hours of an incident, let alone weeks or months later! Phone records/bank statements- How would other clubs have those regarding Saints staff? If you mean the EFL, this isn't a police investigation, there is no obligation for those to be produced.

CB Fry did Plus what other evidence would there be apart from CCTV?

Whatever? You said I did, but I didn't. Cherry picking what?

How long do you think CCTV footage is kept for?

I didn't mention Southampton Common.

Then becomes his word vs the club. Why should they favour his word unless he had stronger evidence than his statement?

Middlesbrough weren't treating it as sensitive info until after the spying event. If they had they would block views. I could have gone to the hotel, made notes of the training and then DM'd them to one of the many Saints staff who follow me on X. I'm not governed by EFL rules. So complaints by Kim Hellberg it was highly sensitive and secretive are flawed.

Middlesbrough weren't treating it as sensitive info until after the spying event. If they had they would block views. I could have gone to the hotel, made notes of the training and then DM'd them to one of the many Saints staff who follow me on X. I'm not governed by EFL rules. So complaints by Kim Hellberg it was highly sensitive and secretive are flawed.

My point was regarding claims by the Middlesbrough manager it was highly sensitive information on show. It cant be that sensitive if the view of it isnt blocked. Do you have frosted windows on your bathroom? I haven't disputed a rule has been broken and warrants punishment. That is what you have both missed with your strawman fallacy depiction of my post.

Try reading my point as a whole, not taking one bit out of context.

You keep taking parts of what I said out of context. You aren't taking it as a whole. What did I say that is incorrect?