Matthew Le God

Who shot my Speckled Jim?

It has quotes which would be unusual for a completely made up story. See Charlie Brookers Newswipe for how it works. In the Portsmouth News as well today.

Carrier pigeon then.

Fax machine, email or pigeon?

I never thought I'd see the day where I have to shake a sixaxis controller to use a virtual asthma inhaler!

It isn't the same club as it won't be allowed to keep the history and achievement of Portsmouth and call them its own. Yes, the phoenix club will be a direct replacement but it is a different entity.

Yes, but what helped us lose? O'Hara and Quincy both played and scored and if the club was insolvent they shouldn't have signed. Did Pompey win fair and square sing players they shouldn't have? Games have been replayed when a player is ineligible. If Pompey are wound up then a replay can't happen, Saints should go through.

Well the League Cup 2nd round game this season was close between Saints and Brum.

Heavy Rain is made by the same developer.

Wikipedia can be edited buy anyone! I could go on there and say the stadium is being expanded to 70,000 and is being funded by Peter Storrie.

O'Hara and Quincy both scored. If they were insolvent it was illegal for them to be playing for them.

Which is why it may be better to develop when crowds are already lower. If gates are averaging 20k like now and work reducing capacity to 20k, then it doesn't have much of an impact. As soon as Saints are back in the Premiership average will go straight over 30k from the 1st season back onwards. To then reduce capacity during work means a loss of income.

I have watched the first half on Sky+. Not sure if I'll ever get round to the second.

No-one will buy them. Too much debt for too little return.

Last line of this is interesting... http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/2854846/FA-have-no-plan-if-Pomp-go-pop.html Quotes from an unnamed FA source. Considering Pompey were possibly insolvent when O'Hara and Quincy signed and both played key roles in the game and there is no precedent I think a reinstatement is justified.

Last line of this is interesting... http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/2854846/FA-have-no-plan-if-Pomp-go-pop.html Quotes from an unnamed FA source. Considering Pompey were possibly insolvent when O'Hara and Quincy signed and both played key roles in the game and there is no precedent I think a reinstatement is justified.

http://www.footballgroundguide.com/wycombe_wanderers/

Looks awesome! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZVfyQyu9RY

Care to elaborate? Something like this...? Both are American definitions of a "Statement of Affairs", though I'd imagine they are similar to the UK version.

Because Vectis the company doing it are independent. Apart from Vectis executive chairman Ken Dulieu, who used to be Southampton chairman. Based on this they may be open to bribes from Peter Storrie... http://www.accountancyage.com/accountancyage/news/2250997/vantis-execs-charged-219m

It is illegal to trade whilst insolvent. The club will stop or the directors would be liable to any further debts along with sanctions to them personally for continuing.

If the report confirms they are insolvent they won't be allowed to continue trading for 12 more days until the court case.

I wonder if more would be released if the 44k get sold?

If Plymouth fail to build the stadium they promised then it would then go to one of the rejected bid cities like Hull or Leicester.

No Saints aren't. That isn't an official website.