Matthew Le God

We play a one striker system so don't really need a replacement for 4th choice Downs. Another striker only needed if Archer actually goes, but his move might be contingent on Armstrong staying/leaving.

Replacement for Armstrong incoming...

The article words it as "£2m of achievable add-ons". Wolves staying up isn't really achievable. They will be a Championship club next season. So the £2m will probably be for appearances & goals. Both of which are achievable for him in the Championship.

Which bit do you find funny? I even used the words 'very outside chance'. So didn't say it was likely.

Because we still have a very outside chance of the playoffs. So don't want to strengthen a potential rival.

How do you know that?

Why a journeyman?

What opinion of his minuses have you formed that doesn't use numbers?

He is out of his depth in the Premier League. But dismissing him in the Championship is ridiculous. He is the current 2nd top scorer in the league! He was also the 2nd top scorer in his last full Championship season. 79 goals in his last 177 Championship games (5 seasons). Roughly a goal just over every two games is a very good record in the Championship.

He is prolific at this level.

He is very good at this level. As his goal record shows.

He is prolific in this league. That isn't 'bang average'.

If we stay in the Championship why would you not want Armstrong?

She likes dribbling, so Fellows and Scienza will do well

My 3-month-old baby?

63 years old

He isn't German

No need for the aggression. It won't cost you any money, so wondered what the issue was.

Why don't you want to sign up?

If he goes soon, I'd guess it would be Lallana managing the next two games.

Tonda Eckert isn't the answer

Tonda Eckert isn't the answer

They are share issues, where the company creates and sells new shares to investors (public or private) to raise capital for growth, operations, or projects, essentially selling ownership for cash without taking on debt like a loan, though it dilutes existing shareholders' stakes. In this case it is the main shareholder buying shares in his own company as a means to put money into the club.

I didn't say it was spent well as the bit in bold states. But the total amount spent was significantly large. It was mainly spent on rubbish players for the level.

We spent a lot of money under SR in the Premier League. The issue wasn't spending money, the issue was what the money was spent on!