Guan 2.0

If you read the quotes and original quotes it follows, it is easier to 'understade' the context. HTH.

What is rubbish? K billy and I were discussing this at length last night. Rojo was our first choice target, and we knew that (Gardos) was close. The only time we've 'bluffed' with a move was ward, and after consulting both of our sources, we do not believe this to be the case.

This is the version I have heard.

Indeed he did. Check out his other recent posts!

Sometimes terms are agreed and deals put in place, and medicals are delayed by other transfers at their and others clubs.

Indeed. However the announcement, like a few others around the club was delayed by a few days while we finalised new recruits (it seems the club is learning after all!).

As has been mentioned elsewhere on here, Depends on Osvaldo/Celtic Results/Ability to convince Vlarr. Clubs estimates for signings have been pushed back a few days, as you may have noticed! Still, none of our 'Massive' targets are making positive noises though. But our other, lesser well known targets look good.

Club stooge

:)

In total, 70m more than we have with our latest transfers. However, that includes signing on fees and wages, as well as transfer fees. I know that number has been bandied about, but not sure if the fact that it had to pay for everything was known to all. 1 of our incoming transfers is seen as an improving squad player, the other first team. I know it's an open secret anyway, but I said i wouldn't state names. Pointless, if you ask me! And no, they weren't our first choice. Let's just hope that our latest outgoing doesn't waste too much time adjusting his specs, and we can get these over the line.

So answering as much as i can... Osvaldo frees up another space, so 5-6 instead of 4-5. Only 1 of the loans is, t'other is a recent addition to targets. Outfield players - Many of our targets are very exciting. Whether any will come is another matter. Same goes for money spent. Everybody at the club knows how soon the season starts, but do not want to spend money for the sake of it. Separate from the above, is my personal opinion that unless we can make a marquee signing soon (and Vlarr doens't count IMO), we will have to get as high as possible, and hope to improve before Morgan goes (as long as he hasn't made it impossible to stay before the season begins).

A couple of days back, I told people to keep their eyes peeled for a late in the day Loan (RB). I've been told (roughly 10 mins that are trying to complete a move for today, but it may have to wait until Monday. Only announcing on sat/sun if the press or twitter get wind of it. Thats all i have to say for now, I might have to smiley later!

Good to see the OS not going overboard.

Nothing incoming today. Unless Celtic fancy playing without a keeper tonight... That being said, if we agree a late in the day loan, Expect it to be heralded across the OS as the second coming!

K billy has a very good source. That is all!

Only part worth anything. Compromise... only worked out in last 24 hours. Probably a good idea to have told Morgan first. Now even that is in doubt.

I don't know what he knows? And I don't work for the club. So probably not!

I'm guessing he's sourcing pictures for many Asian/Emo ladies.

No one has been able to stop the dominos thus far. Think we are going to now have to pay well over the odds for someone (most likely Vlarr), just to show other targets we can bring people in. One of four Dutch nationals that are priority targets. Quite a bit of buck passing will come to head this week. Boardroom personnel may change, not as much as first team. Morgan was a key member (view of entire club). So we have to do something drastic now. That's as much detail I can go into from the bullet points I was sent. We lose either way with J-rod, MoPo likes Ings as well, and Liverpool fancy both.

I think Burnley are about to realise that all our money isn't reserved for them. They will have to make a final decision soon.

IF the cohesion goes with the old group, I see no harm in manufacturing some more.

For around two minutes, I did. But then I spoke to my source. They had meant to put it in a message along with some news about youth team targets, thought they had, and didn't check. They pointed out that in the last 3 years, there has only been this outgoing player and one incoming player that I didn't know about in advance. Now while the mood is naturally suspicious at the moment, I asked myself (putting myself in the shoes of others on here) what tangible benefit would my source of had by omitting or lying about the omission? It's not like we would have started the season and no-one would have asked where chambers had gone. It was less than 24 hours after speaking to my source that the news broke. So in this case at least, the conspiratorial angle just doesn't make any sense. Now if certain posters want to talk deliberate leaks - has anyone seen the express today?

From my own point of view, I was informed that RK decided that Lovren was toxic and that the damage he could do to morale would outweigh and benefit that 'making a stand' would bring. He wants Morgan to stay. But I doubt he thought that Chambers was a loon, and that 16million was just too good a price to turn down. No wonder we're having to offer contracts to every 12 year old with a decent pass...

Full disclosure - I wasn't told about this. Whether that means it's a new development (unlikely) or something we were hoping to prevent, I am not sure. Seriously wondering how we intend to keep Morgan now. Would have to capture all of our targets early next week!