Sheaf Saint

Or possibly SRS. Now there is one banned poster I don't miss one little bit.

Not really. I'm not the sort of person to look down on others just because they choose not to give to charity. It's his choice which charities he donates to, and it wouldn't matter to me if he never gave a penny to anyone in his life. It's just that given stanley's very nationalistic views on many other subjects, it does not surprise me in the slightest that he chooses not to donate to any foreign causes.

Quelle surprise!

I used to be quite generous up until I got made redundant a few years ago. Finding myself out of work and wondering how the hell I was going to pay the mortgage made me re-evaluate my whole attitude towards money and, as a result, I am now a lot more cautious and conservative with it.

My money is on Turkish

And we all know how well Sven handles pressure don't we

Oh pleeeeeease let this be true. If this whole sorry episode results in Glenn Beck being taken off the air then it will have all been worth it IMO.

So The Stain has been banned because there is some suspicion he might have been an alter ego of Deppo? Well, OK I can maybe take the point that multiple usernames are frowned upon, but did he actually post something as The Stain that contravened the rules? I ask this because I liked The Stain as a poster - he made a good contribution to the forum. So what if it was the same person as Deppo? Fair play to him for making the effort to ensure that the two different aliases had two completely different personalities. And one question for the mods: are you certain it was actually the same person? Because it is not uncommon for certain ISPs to present the same IP address for multiple users, regardless of the actual broadband line they are on.

FAO Corp Ho... I think you need to see a doctor about your incontinence. all this PM'ing yourself can't bee good for you. Could be an early sign of the onset of Diabetes or Prostrate Cancer. Worth getting checked out, don't you think? Only thinking of your health mate

This too is my dream for the future of humanity.

More to the point: why do people indulge him? Don't feed the trolls.

And still it goes deeper... http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jul/12/news-of-the-world-pinging

Hmmm. I would question your estimate of only 1% being bad apples. I mean, if the royal guard can be bought for as little as £1k then it does make you wonder just how rife this issue is.

Good god no! I can't believe you would suggest such a thing!

Holy sheet! A Lib Dem councillor that can't even spot the blatant right wing agenda of her preferred newspaper? Remind me never to vote for her!

I agree with all of this, and it is perhaps inevitable that Labour would take this point-scoring opportunity to attack Cameron and criticise his judgement. But I still don't see why anybody's views on the whole subject would or should be dictated by their political leanings, which appears to be the point that Lord Duckhunter is trying to make.

OK, have you ever gone to the newsagents with the intention of buying, for example, the Telegraph, only to change your mind and buy the Express because they had a picture of a celebrity on the front page? Thought not.

Why are you using this issue to have a pop at 'lefties' (whoever they may be)? I haven't seen anybody throughout the course of this thread claim that hacking and deception is OK so long as the victim is on the opposite side of the political spectrum, but it appears from your posting that this is the picture you are trying to paint. I ask again - Why should an individual's political persuasion dictate whether or not they find hacking and corruption distasteful. This is an issue that has nothing to do with left or right, but right and wrong.

As many people have already requested, please don't bring political point-scoring into this. For once I am in complete agreement with dune ()... it doesn't matter what your political persuasion is, nobody should be happy about bribery and corruption in our police / security services.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jul/11/phone-hacking-news-international-gordon-brown So Mr Murdoch, Ms Brooks... would you care to revise your stataments in which you insisted this whole sorry episode was due to one bad apple in the bunch (ie - the NotW)? It seems preety clear that the culture of hacking and illegally obtaining information via deception was widespread across all of NI's publications. do you still insist you knew nothing about it at the time? I think I just saw Babe fly past my window!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jul/11/phone-hacking-royal-contact-book Surely this is tantamount to treason???

I have been thinking about this today... One of the points raised by a number of posters relating to the popularity of the NotW is that they are only satisfying a demand, and that the British public are partly to blame for the phone-hacking scandal due to our thirst for gossip, and this has got me thinking... Is this really the case? Or is it more like a self-fulfilling prophecy - in that they tell us what we want to read and eventually people accept that this is normal and enters popular culture? Think about it... Will anybody on here who ever bought the NotW admit that they only bought it because they wanted their fill of juicy celebrity gossip? That certainly isn't the impression I get. Based on the posts I have seen recently, most people only ever bought it for their excellent sports coverage. I am reminded of the furore surrounding the culture of the paparazzi in the wake of the death of princess Diana in 1997, and how they desperately tried to justify their existence with the line that "pictures sell papers". Well I can honestly say I have never bought a newspaper based solely on the picture printed on the front and I expect most, if not all, will agree. I guess my point is that the media like to tell us what we, the British public, want. But is what we actually want often completely different from their own deluded ideas? And do they subconsciously have a hold over the popular culture by constantly repeating the same ethos until we accept it as part of modern life?

They just played the recording of his call on Newsnight.

Dancing bumper to bumper?

Don't worry Phil, you're not the only cynic. This was pretty much my first thought when I saw on the news earlier that today's share price drop wiped the best part of £2.5billion off the overall value of BSkyB.