Jump to content

Greedyfly

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    931
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Greedyfly

  1. And people are looking to Yoshida as a full time replacement for Hoedt; they are as bad as each other.
  2. Does he? I thought so vs Burnley but I think he's been bloody dreadful since which is a shame as I had/still have some high hopes for him...those hopes have since been tempered somewhat. Ings looks like he is quality and has benefited from being at Liverpool, if not from a game time perspective. Considering his goals this season are as a result of almost no consistent creativity behind him I think he's a good signing. Also think Gunn was a good signing and the fee would have been good if we could have shifted Forster.
  3. This. Thousand times this.
  4. Said this one last year, he know's how to, relatively speaking, organise a defence.
  5. Yep, would be my preferred line-up also. Expect to see something not at all resembling this then.
  6. Should he be this season's hero then? He shouldn't even be considered this season's mediocre bracket player.
  7. No chip. Thought it was a bit much making assumptions off of a third person assessment, after Sim's had been there a day, on his debut, at a new club etc etc.
  8. Absolutely. Someone as an out, a bit of strength and endeavour, and preferably one that can act as a focal point, instead of a headless chicken.
  9. Then you both enjoy mediocre football because I, and others I've spoken to, watched a **** affair on MNF between two ****e sides. Turkish noted above about being 'all over' Milan at the San Siro; that is what I would call 'being all over someone', not Redmond running into blind alleys, Moi still looking **** and Long being Long. Bottom line is we have a ****e manager, a ****e squad of players and little hope of playing entertaining football this season (and maybe scraping the odd win) with those two situations as they are. The problem is that those situations are also born out of poor management from the top, all the way down.
  10. He's changed his tune, has he?
  11. Three different people, who don't support Saints, sat and watched that game. Most remarked that we had slightly more class on the ball in the first half and that Brighton were making it easy for us by sitting off. Not one would agree that it was high quality football where we were some reincarnation of 1970 Brazil. We were better, we weren't however, impressive or all over them. I've watched it once and the highlights. Maybe you should strain yourself and do the same and not from your pitch view seat. Like I said, some people in here are entertained by mediocre football and 'effort'. Usually those who think 0 goals and assists is reasonable return from Redmond.
  12. Can't score with no shots on target. So it's you chatting ****. But do carry on getting carried away with sub standard football.
  13. Ahhh it is 'live hype', I get it now. Well with the benefit of replays, being able to see more of the game, rewind stuff and you know, stats, we weren't. However, if by 'all over them' you mean knocking it around ineffectually without actually challenging their goalkeeper, then yes. We were all over them.
  14. Don't agree. Watching from home we knocked the ball about in front of them because they weren't stepping up. We defo weren't all over them or creating them any problems
  15. Yeah sounds about right for this place. Effort and work rate is a counter for a lack of any other attribute.
  16. Might have been sarcastic in my delivery but the facts are he contributes the sum of **** all. Team wise, shambolic performance but expected when you only have shambolic players at your disposal. Single digits for goals and assists combined last season, going the same way for Redmond again this. Long, well he's always been a ****ing disaster outside of the Championship but he runs a lot so people like him. So anyone who's happy that we're still stuck with them both as first team players has a better drug dealer than I do. Relegation battle again with drab, boring, pedestrian football.
  17. Yes, literally basking in the glow of his zero goals, zero PL assists. He's as ineffective as Long and those impressed by him are those that believe effort is all you need as a premier league footballer.
  18. We weren't all over them at all. Can only assume people saying that got caught up in the live hype. We were better, I agree. We were not all over them and it took one wonder strike to come close to breaking the deadlock. As always lots of running and possession and no end product. We're boring and in effective. Horrible combination.
  19. Gotta disagree. Brighton simply stepped up 10 yards to stop us playing out from the back. Both teams were lethargic but we wanted it a bit more in the first half, them the second. Without Ing's pen we lose that game.
  20. He's not even that ****ing fancy either.
  21. I ****ing hope not.
  22. This is interesting to read though, so thanks for offering some genuine insight.
  23. And from people I've spoken to, and in the media. Seems a real mixed bag. Then I come on this thread and we're discussing some ****e songs so that was helpful.
  24. Great, thanks. He sounds good.
  25. How did he play on Saturday, I've read wildly conflicting views.
×
×
  • Create New...