Turkish

Not that he's playing the defensive system we play by tucking inside and it's Lallanas job to cut off the flank then?

shhhh!! Too early for that!

Yep, got Rickie out of trouble there, of course nothing will be said about the crap pass.

Lets stop poncing about with it and get it in the mixer.

Damn that Sky anti Saints agenda.

I guess the "joke" was lost on you.

Yep and well deserved. Anyway, i'm watching the game so i'll let you cary on with worrying about why other fans are supporting Saints.

Your correct.

Very good analysis by Gary Nevllie again. The shape is good, just very poor defensive errors. Spot on.

Well said. Apart from it You're for your first word.

Long. Although i'm sure he could make Fonte look like he was running with cement casts on.

He's not THAT quick....

What a moron. Why follow Saints? Because i do and because i have done for the last 27 years since my first game. Unlike some of the clowns on here who believe that people are looking round for a club to support so why cant that be Saints? I feel that the club chose me and i'll support it through thick and thin as i always have done, putting my money where my mouth is season after season, even if i dont like the league we are in, the owners, the way they we got about business, the way fans are treated, how crap we are and in some cases in the past most of the players. Good to see you've got nothing better to do than slag off other fans and forum members 30 minutes before one of our most important matches of the season though. It's clear where some peoples priorities lie.

Well it looks like you were right about the first part........

We'll find out when the accounts are released then wont we.

Sorry, so what are we paying it back with if it's not next years money?

So when Cortese said in 2010, whilst we were in League One, that clubs spend money they dont have and if we get to the premier league he would hope not to need paracute payments; what he meant was that if we reach the premier league several seasons later then we wont be spending money against money that will arrive in two years and wont need the parachute payments? Not really correlating with talk of European football in 3 years time like he has been on about is it?

What about this bit? "clubs spend money they don't have, they spend next years money. They spend money that will not arrive for two years and say 'But we'll have some success and bring in more cash to cover the shortfall' it cannot be sustained, in good times you need to save money for bad time" Spending money they dont have, spending next years money. Isn't this what we are doing?

No, i can only see one as well, the second one as well which looks like Newcastle v Fulham. You best get that dial up in your bedsit sorted Bradley.

Plus the lack of stripes wont having a slimming effect on you.

It's okay, i was joking. You wont be expected to provide a source as it's a positve report on what you were told. If you've been told something that sounded negative a source and proof would have been demanded. Thanks for sharing.

Pipe down Bradley or i'll tell Stuey you're getting lemon and he'll sort you out.

It's one of a number of c*ck ups though isn't it.

It makes perfect sense. Thanks for sharing. Although it still goes against what Cortese said in March 2010 about not borrowing against future income. However in true spazboard style Where is the proof? I demand a source and proof otherwise it isn't true.

Except it isn't though it it COlin. Think back to our relegation, six months before we sold Beattie for £6m, after relegation we made a £5m profit on Crouch and six months later made a £10m profit on Walcott- although admittedly we didn't get it all in on hit. Even so, you're looking at a £20m profit on just three players yet we still were in the deep sh*t financially following relegation. Lets not delude ourselves into thinking that it'll all be okay because we'll get our money on the players we've brought, our history shows that that is not automatically the case.