Turkish

Some ridiculous comments in there "it's as important as the European championships" To Africans it's more important than the Euros, what with it being an African tournament and all that, in the same way the Copa America is more important to South Americans than the Euros is. So why would Europeans care as much for the African Cup of Nations as they do the Euros? oh must be racism. Also why does the competition get so much flack? Cant say i've really heard any but probably if it's does is because fans care more about their clubs than a load of matches thousands of miles away where they hardly any heard of most of the players other than ones that play for their club or the real superstars. Plus their country isn't involved in it. Or maybe it's simply because everyone is racist? 🤷‍♂️

The Mike Ashley Derby

Didnt the athletic run a piece at the start of the month saying there were two interested parties with a chance we might be sold by the end of they year?

I wonder if it's like buying a house when you dont hear anything from them for weeks and when you chase for an update by amazing coincidence the latest updated information had arrived that very morning.

It’ll be an NHS one, thanks for the link but we live in Yorkshire 😉 She’s managed to get one now but got to drive 25 miles away, going in the morning. She’s fine though, just says feels like she’s getting a cold, which was exactly what my mate said when he had it a week to so ago. feel sorry for our neighbours, he’s in the army just got back from a 6 month tour and him and his missus went down with it on Christmas Eve, now isolating all over Christmas and new year

This could be the greatest moment in your posting history, forever confirmed as a saintsweb great. Join me up here in the legends enclosure.

Is your source the same as FTs? No one seems to know who it us, not even those who think it's done, i guess that could be a good thing as not loud mouths spouting off, if i remember rightly Marcus Liebherrs bid only became public knowledge a day or two before it was completed.

That isn't the source. The guy who posted it is usually pretty reliable and i know him personally. If he says it's going to happen i trust him, although a little strange there hasn't been a sniff of this in the media, not even a rumour.

and doesn't it suit you! 😃

Reference to gammon ✔️ Laughing Emoji ✔️ only two more posts for the full set where you start calling people cunts, thick and saying "its not rocket science"

Yeah maybe! What a brilliant point mate, i cant think why they call you aintclever

Wife has just tested positive on a lateral flow and cannot book a PCR test anywhere in the county

Interesting that those arguing it was definitely a foul, Doherty made no attempt to play the ball, using his back being to Forster as their "proof" are the stattos and aintclever, who when it comes to any subject on here just backs whatever decision has been made, he is the Peter Walton of this forum.

I see Sky are being dramatic as every with break news alerts everytime someone gets covid, already had one today about Arteta and now some darts players who has pulled out of the PDC after testing positive.

Yep that's how i saw it, why a keeper of Forsters size isn't claiming of clearing that above his head is bizarre, there is contact but it's minimal, we'd be fuming if the goal had been disallowed up the other end. It's laughable people trying to make out he deliberately fouled Forster and only looked at him, he attacked a ball coming in from the Spurs right whilst running in from the left, follows the flight of the ball all the way and anyone who has ever headed a ball in their life knows you cant just jump up like a Jack in the Box to get leverage and power, there will be a motion in your body to get the height and connection needed. Very lucky to get away with that. As for the offside under the rules and given we had at least one disallowed by a sleeve last season then it's the correct and consistent decision, would have been annoyed if the goal had stood.

Why does it matter if he had his back to Forster or not? Like i said, i doubt you've ever tried to win a header in match in your life. He was clearly jumping, eyes on the ball, using arms to leverage to get to head the ball. laughable people saying he was not trying to get the ball and deliberately fouled Forster.

No it doesn't. You're talking Utter nonsense as usual. You stattos have probably never jumped to head a ball in your life so i wouldn't expect you to get it.

Under the rules he was offside and given that we had one disallowed for Ings sleeve being offside last season it was the right call, although the argument still stands about which part of the body should the decision be made on.

Here is is my freeze frame evidence he was looking at the ball and not only jumping into Forster whilst backing into him to stop him catching it.

Your freeze frame photos prove nothing. Trying to say he wasn't looking at the ball only jumping backing into Forster is laughable and embarassing.

That isn't what happened at all.

We could rely on you to get it wrong as well.

There aren’t many neutrals when it comes to spurs though. Either you’re a spurs fans or you hate them

Agreed. Well done on using glovesman too 👏👏👍

I’m struggling to see how anyone can think it was a foul. If that has been us having a goal disallowed there would be uproar about biased refs favouring the big clubs. It was poor goalkeeping and we got lucky simple as