Jump to content

moonraker

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    1662
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by moonraker

  1. And this from the twat that we had negotiating the Brexit deal, amateurs the lot of them. I would not employ any of the current crop of senior Tories to clean my windows for fear or indelible smears.
  2. The problem is the Tories introduced it to to lure the pensioners votes. They have a track record of luring votes, the sacred Margaret’s council house cut price sell of being the biggest. These short term populist policies always come back to bite you.
  3. moonraker

    Russia

    I do question the policy of allowing inmates unfettered access to the internet.
  4. No it’s akin to the beer hall putsch. That failed but it set the scene for 1932/3. The people who breached congress should be tried for treason, the USA needs to defend their democracy, currently they are pussy footing.
  5. Whilst never having conservative tendencies it is absolutely shocking to see how “Brexit” has effectively destroyed the Tories. David Cameron lit a very long fuse by calling a totally unnecessary referendum because he was unable to manage the loony ERG, and when calling their bluff failed he ran away and hid. We have as a consequence had to suffer May, Johnson and now Trussfuck. If ever a political party can be accused of treason the Tory’s, their myopic supporters and the absolute incompetents they vote in are prime candidates.
  6. moonraker

    Russia

    Meaningless, the U.K. has no plans to unilaterally invade one of its neighbours. We are members of NATO for collective security, international collaboration has so many more benefits than nationalistic posturing. I am not laughing at Russia just painting a picture of where they are. Numbers are meaningless if you do not have the command, leadership, morale and equipment to use them. The idea the U.S. could have stopped it is absurd, no NATO country was attacked it would have meant the US declaring war on Russia. History of warfare is littered with much larger armies being routed by smaller better motivated and equipped opponents. The definition of madness is to continue to do the same thing even when it fails.
  7. moonraker

    Russia

    I do have a military/defence background. Some of the most knowledgeable analysts of military capability have no military background but do have a deep understanding of military campaigns, doctrine and what works. As I said above logistics are critical to a successful military campaign. But you also have to be fully prepared. Whilst the Russians started with some well trained troops these cannot be replaced by conscription. The very minimum training required for a half decent infantry soldier is 6 months, other combat troops, artillery, armour etc. take longer to train and that assumes you have sufficient equipment, supplies and experienced trainers. You then need capable and experienced NCOs and junior officers to lead them in the field. Russian doctrine is top down command with little if any autonomy for commanders at the operational and tactical levels. When you add to this the questionable quality of their maintenance, reliability, and operation of their combat systems, they have a serious problem that I contend their military and political culture is incapable of fixing, certainly not within the time frame of “The Special Military Operation”. A final caveat, there is never certainty in war, but if I were a betting man I know where my money would go.
  8. moonraker

    Russia

    I disagree, to conduct a credible and successful military campaign logistic are everything. Disrupting supplies and support, even on a temporary basis, has as much if not greater value than shooting down a couple of MIGs or blowing up a few tanks. Throughout history the victors in military campaigns have been those who ,understood, managed and prioritised logistics. The Russians have been very poor at this to date and anything the Ukraine can do to disrupt their efforts even further will pay dividends. That is not to mention the PR value of this strike.
  9. Duckie for once I agree, 2 bands should be sufficient, and the 40% thread hold needs to be raised significantly. My point was we are not a high tax country compared to comparable countries.
  10. I was responding to Duckies specific point, our Tax rates are competitive even with a top rate of 45%. Most European countries have additional "Taxes" similar to our NI as your source shows. I also looked at a listing that looked at all personal forms of "Tax" and the table was essentially the same the UK is not close to being the highest taxed. It is interesting that the lowest taxed countries are also the poorer ones. One of the issues is that comparing different tax jurisdictions is like comparing apples and pears.
  11. With the UK personal tax burden 17th out of 27 European countries with the 45% many would conclude we are competitive. Its also interesting that all the countries with higher tax rates have better per capita GDP than the UK so somewhat unusually both you and Alister Darling may be wrong.
  12. Perfect for Rishi to mount a second bid. Even the swivel eyed geriatrics who populate the Tory membership must see they got it wrong the first time, not that any of the current Tory parliamentary party has much appeal as a PM. If Bojo is found in breech of parliamentary rules he may well be barred from standing.
  13. Truss won’t be PM by the next election.
  14. moonraker

    Russia

    Comrade Alexi please tell us it is all going to plan. The superior technology and fighting capability of the mighty Russian army is inflicting unsustainable damage on the NAZIs of Ukraine. Tell us the truth, as you seem to believe you have a far greater insight than the rest of us.
  15. moonraker

    Russia

    He will also have to consider Chinas reaction if he were to use a nuclear weapon. So far they have been passively supportive, I am not sure they would sanction a nuclear strike, even tactical. China may be building ever bigger and presumably more effective military capability, it’s core strategy is economic dominance any escalation or spread of the war in Ukraine will not serve their interests.
  16. Who the fuck are they anyway!
  17. Cracking build up thread, obviously infiltrated by Ralph luvies as I have not seen much discussion on the game or the genetic Ralph hasn’t got a clue posts. If it’s allowed I’d like to comment on the game, whatever their recent form and obvious internal problems Utd are full of quality. We are more than capable of matching their intensity combine this with some clever winding up of a couple of their prima donnas and we have a very good chance.
  18. Utd played well, however Liverpool were very poor, the worst defensive display from them for a very long time. If that had been a Saints defensive performance this board would be in melt down. I do not get the TAA hype he can’t defend and his so called set piece, tonight especially, was at best average. We will need to get at Utd, they have real individual quality, the key is can they bring it together again as they did tonight for a less high profile game.
  19. Sad news, a wonderful player
  20. The first of the few
  21. The USA has a serious issue. The extremists are driving the agenda, we have all rightly condemned Islamic fundamentalists and Putin yet it seems the clear and present danger is from within, right wing Christian/conservative fundamentalists. It denies democracy, it usurps the law and it belittles personal choice, it looks like, sounds like and behaves like Germany 1932, very scary.
  22. No
  23. Expectation and hope are two different things, i expect us to lose I hope we win
  24. No he or she is either pissed or stoned, certainly not sane.
×
×
  • Create New...