Jump to content

saintant

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    6,420
  • Joined

Everything posted by saintant

  1. It was largely against 10 fucking men!
  2. The owners don't come out of this with any credibilty. SR and, in particular Ankersen, showing they have no clue how to run a football club. We've been in a race to the bottom since they stepped through the door. Charlatans.
  3. Well, the genius that is Ankersen decided he had to be given more time so it's on him.
  4. Yes, Ankersen should be made to pay for his part in this debacle. And he managed to make it worse by giving his man another week so we had to endure today's total embarrassment.
  5. It's the bits Rasmus was on about that we don't get to see but are the reasons Jones must stay.
  6. That's it - losing 2-0 against ten men. Do the thing you should have done last week Ankersen. Disgraceful.
  7. But we don't see all that brilliant work on the tra But we've lost 1-0 to the 10 men.
  8. How will Mad Nate justify this debacle against ten men?
  9. On the front foot I see Mad Nate - you can't even do it against ten men you absolute fraud.
  10. Wolves haven't had a shot on target and are drawing with us. Thanks Janny B!
  11. If we manage a point it will feel as bad as a defeat considering they have had ten men for most of the match. Against ten you keep the ball, play two wingers hugging the touchline and wear them down. Not us though. Jones out now. That's enough.
  12. Surprise, surprise - our very own Janny B with yet another own goal to his collection. What a joke player.
  13. It's what we do when we are winning - had you forgotten?
  14. Still only one shot on target against ten men?
  15. Not watching but playing against ten men I'm assuming we have a winger on each flank hugging the touch line to stretch them?
  16. Winning but only one shot on target - need more efforts on goal with them down to ten.
  17. Disallowed for offside - as you were.
  18. Five at the back including Janny B and Lyanco - it's bound to happen.
  19. We'll be thinking Jones finally did it his way and we still lost - over to you Rasmus.
  20. Does that mean the algorithm is unreliable/flawed or has Jones just been unlucky that the team have been brilliant on the training pitch but shit in actual matches? I'm just trying to get a sense for these fancy data analytics because it looks to me like we employed a manager who has made us a lot worse than we were before he came. I'm willing to be open minded and maybe someone can persuade me that Ankersen knew what he was doing and, like in the film Moneyball, we'll suddenly go on a winning streak.
  21. Is that the same algorithm Ankersen used to appoint Jones?
  22. Agree with this. He's not hiding anything that will be unleashed tomorrow. He's consistently losing football matches....if he had something up his sleeve to turn things around we'd have seen it by now. Don't be taken in by the smoke and mirrors.
  23. Think you are right. Funny, since Janny B returned we have started to let in one goal followed quickly by another - can't be coincidence.
  24. Not even Janny B....shame!
  25. No chance of him being sacked after a win. The only scenario I see him going is if we play poorly and suffer an embarrassing defeat where we offer little or nothing. Anything else and Rasmus keeps his man in place.
×
×
  • Create New...