saintant

Wolves haven't had a shot on target and are drawing with us. Thanks Janny B!

If we manage a point it will feel as bad as a defeat considering they have had ten men for most of the match. Against ten you keep the ball, play two wingers hugging the touchline and wear them down. Not us though. Jones out now. That's enough.

Surprise, surprise - our very own Janny B with yet another own goal to his collection. What a joke player.

It's what we do when we are winning - had you forgotten?

Still only one shot on target against ten men?

Not watching but playing against ten men I'm assuming we have a winger on each flank hugging the touch line to stretch them?

Winning but only one shot on target - need more efforts on goal with them down to ten.

Disallowed for offside - as you were.

Five at the back including Janny B and Lyanco - it's bound to happen.

We'll be thinking Jones finally did it his way and we still lost - over to you Rasmus.

Does that mean the algorithm is unreliable/flawed or has Jones just been unlucky that the team have been brilliant on the training pitch but shit in actual matches? I'm just trying to get a sense for these fancy data analytics because it looks to me like we employed a manager who has made us a lot worse than we were before he came. I'm willing to be open minded and maybe someone can persuade me that Ankersen knew what he was doing and, like in the film Moneyball, we'll suddenly go on a winning streak.

Is that the same algorithm Ankersen used to appoint Jones?

Agree with this. He's not hiding anything that will be unleashed tomorrow. He's consistently losing football matches....if he had something up his sleeve to turn things around we'd have seen it by now. Don't be taken in by the smoke and mirrors.

Think you are right. Funny, since Janny B returned we have started to let in one goal followed quickly by another - can't be coincidence.

Not even Janny B....shame!

No chance of him being sacked after a win. The only scenario I see him going is if we play poorly and suffer an embarrassing defeat where we offer little or nothing. Anything else and Rasmus keeps his man in place.

Well many of us are calling out the person who employed him after using a raft of data that clearly was misinterpreted in a big way. Jones is being allowed to carry on to avoid damaging some bigger egos at the club.

I think this relates to the video of a training session with Nathan Jones wearing a microphone and sounding a bit like a 1960's PE teacher.

I'm expecting a similar set-up and game to the debacle that was Nottingham Forest. I think that was the real Nathan Jones at work and let's remember he alone thought that was a good performance. More of the same coming tomorrow I suspect.

Can we pin the failure of Nathan Jones on Rasmus? Because from where I'm sitting that was a huge mistake and does not reflect well on his abilities.

Well he has to be best at something - clearly he was a shit footballer.

Well I'm not sure of his influence at Midtyjlland but I think Phil Giles was and still is the brains at Brentford.

I'm convinced we don't have any what I would term football savvy people running the club. If you look at the four guys answering questions at the forum none of them strike me as being too switched on concerning the ins and outs of the game. They don't inspire me that they know what they are doing. Maybe that will change for the better when Jason Wilcox arrives but these four just seem like a bunch of nerds to me.

Spot on. He'll be really dangerous if we get balls whipped into the area around the six yard box where he can get his head or a long leg there ahead of defenders - he has scored a lot of goals like this without barely having to jump. Long balls would be better played to his chest for him to control and bring others into play. Have a feeling Jones will use him in completely the wrong way.

Jones is not suddenly going to start getting the results we need to avoid relegation - the only person who believes that is Ankersen.