Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    41,886
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. I was given info which I passed on on here as I felt it would be of I terse to some. I trust him but it is always possible he was told what he wanted to hear. After all it will only be cortese who knows the true state of our finances and what is going on with transfers etc.
  2. Hope we sign him. Would be decent and also show that we have finance available.
  3. He is probably right.
  4. But none express their view in such a tiresome and pedantic fashion.
  5. The Kraken has answered that well. Even if we sell out, there is not huge amount more to justify a large capacity increase.
  6. It doesn't mean that at all. There are a host of factors which mean you get higher attendances in a lower division. We were no normal league one club, we had heavy backing for the first time in our history.
  7. How is sharing his personal experiences with saints twisting history?
  8. Averaging 22,000 does not mean selling out every week in the premiership. We don't need a bigger stadium. You are f*cking dull.
  9. His mate Brian Howard.
  10. Good. No need for one.
  11. Pleased they have released the info early enough to give fans a chance to make travel arrangements.
  12. And whatever they do you will praise them for it.
  13. We shall see what we have spent and on whom at the end of the window
  14. We are supposedly running the club to break even. Leicester are not taking that approach. That is why we will not outbid them.
  15. I have uses the evidence available to make an informed guess.
  16. Cb fry has a tendency to speak sense and show others up for what they are. Largely deluded.
  17. Which is a much bigger gamble.
  18. Well their history of sky high wages from last season suggests that they will spend big (and they have been tipped to spend big too.)
  19. No I didn't. If a poster is going to make up lies then at least man up and post after they have been made to look foolish.
  20. It's not flawed logic, it's presumption on both our parts. You presume that we got the targets we were looking for whilst I see that the quality of our signings decreased despite being linked to players of a higher quality. This transfer window will show which scenario was most likely.
  21. Thank you! Nice to see some common sense on here.
  22. That is up for debate. I would argue that the majority signed in our first season is what won us promotion.
  23. It becomes relevant if we miss out on signings this season since the majority agree that we need some quality to achieve promotion.
  24. Or a list of players who we have missed out on because their agent told them it wasn't worth the hassle with saints or advised them to join an alternative club.
  25. FFS I an NOT saying it is a negative. What I am not doing is automatically assuming everything is positive and anything negative is lies or people with an agenda.
×
×
  • Create New...