hypochondriac

Whether you believe in god or not, that is a woeful interpretation of Christianity.

two hundred quid.

Yes apparenty that is all true. Few little extra bits too.

Don't really think it's the sellers fault but what should happen is you should get your money back and he should start a claim against UPS.

The united fans kicking off at the giddy bridge last year was ridiculous.

And on that note, st chalet? Can we finally put this thread out of it's misery?

I knew exactly what I was posting though didn't explain it very well. Apologies if you had difficulty following.

Because you accused me of not being a fan, because you started a thread harking back to comments made six months previously in a heat of the moment thread with ott comments in it from myself immediately after we have had another disagreement. You then claim it is nothing to do with me and you have no idea how I could come to that conclusion. Well that's rubbish as far as I am concerned. It has nothing to do with the cap fitting on my head. You have an argument with me and then the very next day produce this thread and then pretend that this was a total coincidence. You have a problem with people who post negative views which you deem to be over the top. Well I and others have the exact same problem except the posters I and others cannot stand are those with their blinkered positivity and those who do not allow discussion about a theory or piece of information deemed negative. For every poster on this topic agreeing with you, there is a poster who disagrees and it would be good if posters like yourself took notice of what was said by those posters and thought about what you post before criticising others. If you were prepared to accept that you were part of the problem then perhaps posters like myself would be more inclined to tone down our approach and be less confrontational. Sadly you think it's is everyone elses fault but your own. I am prepared to admit that at time I let emotion get the better of me and that on occasion I can provoke reactions. Are you prepared to look at the shortcomings in your posting?

Fantastic. Don't reply then.

If Derry believes that is fine for him to label people a problem poster then he should realise that he is also viewed as such by other posters. Having said that, in my opinion it is arrogant to label anyone as a problem poster simply because you disagree with what they say and how they say it and defend themselves. I don't think anyone is a problem poster as such, I do think posters like Derry would do well to be more open minded about topics on here but I would happily have a sensible conversation with him if he was up for it. I don't know why I am bothering to reply to you though tbh. It will probably give you the attention you crave.

I am interested in well mannered discussion about football and sfc. It's just that Canada saint and yourself get so offended by posters with an opinion they do not like, that they have to start threads like this designed to cause trouble (whatever he claims) or claim that the likes of myself is not a true fan. I want to discuss saints and theories about sfc in both a positive AND negative way with those prepared to do so. If you have no desire to do that then as you suggest, it would be better if you ignored me.

Theuglyinside has all the details from people who were there.

But in the view of many you are also a problem poster. Who has decided that you are the one who can judge if someone is a problem poster or not? How arrogant of you. I certainly won't be changing my posting style due to this thread and I would hope that others aren't scared by you and your mates and will continue to air their opinions, whether I agree with them or not.

Absolutely the best post on here. Sums it up perfectly. If only the positivity police were able to do that then the forum would not have a problem.

How can anyone think there is a positive minority on here? Many of the positive posters are the most militant in their views and least accepting of opposing opinions.

I want one with simply DFCSB on it.

If you read my initial responses, I said that my comments were ott because I was annoyed immediately after a game. I also said that I realised this the day after and posted as much at the time.

On this thread there are at least ten posters who agree. You clearly haven't bothered to read it and jumped in with assumptions. I'm allowed a right to reply and a right to defied myself against people posting rubbish as fact as you just have.

Great post and it would certainly make me think more about what I post if we had the likes of Canada saint being able to accept the opinions of others more readily.

Seriously mods can we lock this yet? It's serving no purpose that I can see apart from seeing posters at each other's throats.

It's nice of you to stand up for your friend. Is this because I took the mick about your coaching badges?

I would say that Junk has a bit of a reputation as a place which attracts the scummier individuals from Southampton. Of course it can happen anywhere but Junk really is a sh*thole. Anyone that's really sad news, I hope it isn't as serious as it is being made out.

I understand you are close friends with the original poster. No agenda to peddle here then. I certainly consider the original poster one of those I alluded to. Accused more than one poster of wanting the club to fail and not being a fan, simply because their opinion differed to his.

Well if you can't see the abuse that many (not even talking about myself) get just for having an opinion deemed 'negative' then I am staggered. Time and again it happens with the likes of CB Fry given routine abuse. Look at the sh*t Duncan (fitzhugh) gets led by manji and his constant baiting.Nick Illingsworth is a bit of an idiot and has done stupid things but many posters on here cross way over the line. There are loads of examples and certain people set the agenda about what can and cannot be discussed. I visited the ugly inside the other day and OK it isn't to everyone's tastes but you able to discuss topics both positive and negative without being jumped on. There was one post I thought was a decent one from there: Now to me that is a perfectly reasonable view to hold whether you agree with it or not. On here you can't put things like that, you get jumped on and abuse. That's the problem I and many others have with this forum.

But then equally there are a small number who hound out decent posters with perhaps a slightly more negative view.