hypochondriac

We are supposedly running the club to break even. Leicester are not taking that approach. That is why we will not outbid them.

I have uses the evidence available to make an informed guess.

Cb fry has a tendency to speak sense and show others up for what they are. Largely deluded.

Which is a much bigger gamble.

Well their history of sky high wages from last season suggests that they will spend big (and they have been tipped to spend big too.)

No I didn't. If a poster is going to make up lies then at least man up and post after they have been made to look foolish.

It's not flawed logic, it's presumption on both our parts. You presume that we got the targets we were looking for whilst I see that the quality of our signings decreased despite being linked to players of a higher quality. This transfer window will show which scenario was most likely.

Thank you! Nice to see some common sense on here.

That is up for debate. I would argue that the majority signed in our first season is what won us promotion.

It becomes relevant if we miss out on signings this season since the majority agree that we need some quality to achieve promotion.

Or a list of players who we have missed out on because their agent told them it wasn't worth the hassle with saints or advised them to join an alternative club.

FFS I an NOT saying it is a negative. What I am not doing is automatically assuming everything is positive and anything negative is lies or people with an agenda.

Difficult to deal with can be an entirely different thing from not a pushover.

Your comment would have merit if you can find one post on this thread which takes what was said as gospel.

Why are you incapable of engaging in adult discussion?

Lol. Obviously.

Thanks. Unnecessary pedantry the speciality of this place.

Months then. It doesn't lessen the point unless you seriously believe that he created the twitter account to pretend to be an agent to wind up saints fans.

There have been tons of positive runours about infrastructure and signings etc. Tons.

Seems an awful lot of trouble to go to pretending to be an agent on twitter for years with hundreds of boring tweeds designed purely to wind up saints fans.

Any small matter which could reduce the chances of us getting a player we want I see as a negative thing. Not saying this is true but it merits discussion.

The problem with this site is that people pick a view and then defend that whatever happens. People decide Lowe was the worst chairman in history and so exaggerated everything he did wrong and belittled whatever small positives he had. The same thing has happened with cortese where people will defend everything he does and see it as a positive without contemplating for a moment that he could make mistakes or do something wrong. It's gone fro one ridiculous extreme to another.

We do not know If we have missed out on players due to this alleged agent issue which could make us an even better team.

And if this weren't same agent posting Something broadly positive about saints would it be treated with the same skepticism by the majority?

All in saying is it would be nice to discuss rumour both positive and negative without it immediately being accepted or dismissed based upon whether it is positive or negative. You see it on here all the time with the mail printing a negative story which is dismissed as the paper having an agenda against us whilst positive articles from the same paper are roundly applauded!