-
Posts
44,708 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by hypochondriac
-
Can't agree with that. Brooks and Rothwell weren't loan kids, neither was thb and Downes. When Fernandes goes we will obviously pay a fair whack to bring in a top quality for the championship am. Maybe someone like rak sakyi on the wing. I have faith we will bring in a better keeper too.
-
We have little choice. I quite like the Ipswich approach though who appear to have prioritised creating a championship dream team.
-
I get we will most likely start the season with that. I'm just saying I think that's where we could end up by the end of the window. I'm sure we will keep at least one of AA and BBD but I reckon if we get in a couple of attacking options then there will at least be competition for the wide positions. Probably Robinson as well. I think a couple might be on loan but if we do sell all these players there's not a chance in hell imo that we don't get in the required 4-5 players before the window closes in a month.
-
I agree with that and I am frustrated that we haven't got in at least a couple more signings by now to strengthen our attack. Currently it's pretty toothless.
-
As frustrating as it is to do business late in the window, we obviously are going to make multiple signings over the next few weeks. My guess would be at least five which should hopefully completely change our team and remove some of the hangover from last year. Assuming we make the predicted sales I reckon the team may eventually look something lime New gk Bree Quarshie Edwards Wellington Downes Charles New winger new am new winger Downs Maybe Downes or Charles will go and they will be replaced too.
-
If it's true that Juve and athletico are in for Fernandes then he's clearly not going to stay. I think we have a much better chance with dibling, particularly if we have just sold Fernandes and made close to 100 million in sales.
-
Genuinely not sure how Dibling is going to engineer a move. I can't see anyone wanting to spend 35 million plus on him abd I don't think we are going to sell cheap. He'd be much better off trying to tear it up in this league with us for a season.
-
Do you think that questioning the way this act operates in practice puts you on the side of Jimmy Saville?
-
The more underwhelming defenders we lose the better. I doubt we are in for this guy but if we are and we sack off some of the others then I won't complain.
-
I could get a blowie from Sydney Sweeney pal.
-
Lol.
-
Absolutely. If athletic or jiventus are in for fernandes then our best hope is to rinse them for as much money as we can. Good chance of 50 million plus in that scenario.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
hypochondriac replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
So would I and I think Starmer is awful. Beggers belief that anyone would consider Corbyn more intelligent than Starmer whatever you think of either of them. -
I'm glad you used that phrase correctly. Really pisses me off when people say it incorrectly.
-
The thought of Smallbone not being in the squad fills me with joy.
-
Did anyone seriously expect Ramsdale to stay this summer? If I had to predict I would have said he would be first out.
-
Some people have used the character select screen from death stranding to circumvent the verification systems. It's absurd.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
hypochondriac replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
-
fucking hell.
-
Sounds good to me. All of that first lot leaving will be happy days.
-
Looks like they are selling Broadhead to Wrexham for almost 8 million.
-
-
Some sites have simply blocked UK IPs to get Ofcom off their backs which is a pretty sad state of affairs. Wikipedia have apparently taken the government to court because of their categorisation under the act. You had the weirdo government minister claiming Farage supports Saville and pleading with the people this morning to not use VPNs and to do the age verification like good citizens. It will be very interesting to see if the government look to go further here or if they just ignore how relatively ineffective it is and essentially say they've tried.
-
Am guessing this is a joke?
-
Plus the last thing a VPN company wants is for it to be known that it cooperates with authorities and gives up identifying data to governments as that's a surefire way of torpedoing your business. They will fight it all the way and usually win depending in what jurisdiction they are in.
