It's a ridiculous wage considering the hours he worked, that Portvliet was on a lot less and that (allegedly) Crouch was paid nothing for the same role.
Seemed to me he was saying there was no MJ involved to the best of his knowledge in the initial bid. We don't know how involved MJ is with his bid and we don't even know if they were he initial bid who Weston had dinner with. It is possible that Weston was correct and NickG
TBF he didn't actually say that MJ had no involvement with a bid, just that the guy he went to dinner with said nothing about MJ. We don't actually know HOW involved MJ is either. He's probably got a much biggr role in this in his mind.
Yeah but at the same tme you get to know who you can trust (like the people who have got things right in the past.) I would put those two in that category and now nickG who seems to have a decent source. I also know that if master bates gets anything he is putting it up in good faith. I'm not stupid enough to believe that eveything is correct but if you keep your eyes open then you do get a fair bit of correct info.
Here's a concerning post from the Bournemouth board about MJ. Prophetic?
At least they are still trading your "contacts" couldnt even pay the cheque.
And if it wasn't for you acting like a **** during admin sport-6 might not have got the club in the first place.
I dont like what sport-6 (savi) is doing currently but if someone like Marc Jackson thinks he can question them then sorry I have to put my foot down on that.