Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    40,501
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. Maybe to you but considering the bank pulled the plug over "peanuts" we could have done a lot with that money.
  2. It's a ridiculous wage considering the hours he worked, that Portvliet was on a lot less and that (allegedly) Crouch was paid nothing for the same role.
  3. So does tha excuse Lowe's actions? Don't be silly and be honest, it's a ridiculous wage for a team in our position.
  4. It's obscene and makes a mockery of Lowe saying that Pearson was not kept on due to financial considerations.
  5. Especially if Marc Jackson is involved.
  6. Do you disagree?
  7. Seemed to me he was saying there was no MJ involved to the best of his knowledge in the initial bid. We don't know how involved MJ is with his bid and we don't even know if they were he initial bid who Weston had dinner with. It is possible that Weston was correct and NickG
  8. TBF he didn't actually say that MJ had no involvement with a bid, just that the guy he went to dinner with said nothing about MJ. We don't actually know HOW involved MJ is either. He's probably got a much biggr role in this in his mind.
  9. Will most likely never happen. What is it for do you think?
  10. Yeah but at the same tme you get to know who you can trust (like the people who have got things right in the past.) I would put those two in that category and now nickG who seems to have a decent source. I also know that if master bates gets anything he is putting it up in good faith. I'm not stupid enough to believe that eveything is correct but if you keep your eyes open then you do get a fair bit of correct info.
  11. Bit of a difference between a small time part of a consortium and the big backer. Would potentially be harder to get wrong.
  12. I guessed the Candy Brothers ages ago and Weston or FF or someone like that said no.
  13. So dirty. I would.
  14. MB you might want to give your source a kick up the ar*e
  15. Probably annoyed that I posted his picture up on here!
  16. I knew that last bit. He didn't seem terribly concerned.
  17. Good man Trousers. Get on it:p
  18. Do you mean this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HbXzSdResM
  19. Wahey we found him!
  20. Here's a concerning post from the Bournemouth board about MJ. Prophetic? At least they are still trading your "contacts" couldnt even pay the cheque. And if it wasn't for you acting like a **** during admin sport-6 might not have got the club in the first place. I dont like what sport-6 (savi) is doing currently but if someone like Marc Jackson thinks he can question them then sorry I have to put my foot down on that.
  21. What's the Canada link? And where's Trousers when all this is going on? I smell a conspiracy.
  22. They are on behalf of a client who is bidding. To be honest what's in it for anyone?
  23. I also rang then wish I hadn't. Utter ********.
  24. Wasn't that from the Bournemouth site? Was hilarious when I first saw that.
  25. Nickg you were right and I apologise. You can see my reasons for posting what I did though
×
×
  • Create New...