hypochondriac

Nice to see most of the fellow posting whores have already contributed to the thread.

I agree with some of what he says but like many similar parties, his views are too extreme. I want a relationship with Europe but I don't like all these concessions which erode Britain's power to be abl to govern themselves.

Excessive junk food certainly mothers should be disciplined and if they refuse to comply then it should be treated as abuse and their children should be taken into care (and this has happened in the past). Jail is silly and unproductive for both these cases though.

That's a ridiculous comparison.

What he deserves is one thing, but when you realise how much it will cost to keep him in prison, and when prisons are already bursting at the seams, I would suggest that another type of punishment would have been better. That's not to say that the crime isn't odious.

Oh and I hear people are protesting next week about the BBC on QT. Ridiculous if you ask me. It's called freedom of speech. I want them to have the airtime so that they can be exposed for what they are. Besides, most people who have an interest in QT are not the sort of people that the BNP will typically look to be recruiting...

Yeah except that the BNP have seen no rise in their votes recently have they.

Boo. They will be out pretty quick though.

Blurred faces really turn me on. He's done me a favour!

I would LOVE to beat them in the world cup (maybe even a cheating goal.) Having said that, I would be too worried if we got them that they would beat us and make me even more bitter towards them.

Yeah but went to school here from 10. Loosely bred here IMO.

Because saga has the talent but clearly can't be bothered anymore.

Just because they are so much better? (firefox).

Lol. Do you want a bet on that? Seriously?

I know it's now but surman?

Where would you play him?

Tenner.

Oh and that odd episode when he was convinced that the mods were censoring his posts. Mad as a box of frogs

I failed to take art seriously the day he was supposed to post a link to something saints related and instead posted some rather disturbing and graphic gay porn.

In Portsmouth I see.

Shocking treatment was what Burley did to the likes of Rasiak and Jan to Stern John. Play them for a game or two, watch them perform and then drop them for seemingly no reason. Gillet isn't rated clearly (and when he has come on this season he has done nothing to suggest that he should be in contention) and a loan move probably suits both parties. Why is that shocking treatment?

How bizarre. Why is it shocking if he doesn't rate him? Maybe Gillet isn't happy to be backup. Tell me, who would you have him in place of in the team?

I wouldn't gloat just yet Corp. That backfired last time remember?

Not sure why the even bothered to pretend like he had a chance of staying.