hypochondriac

Lol that is Steve's address. Steve, do you like Paint Pots Nursery on Howard Road?

When you are selling a product, you have to assume that your customers are as lazy as possible. It is in your interest to make it as simple as possible to get access and information about your product because there is always the chance that if it is not easy to access that some people may be put off. That is of course unless you don't really want to sell as many as possible...

So in order to get a CVA approved, you can invent a load of old debt and get those creditors to approve a CVA. They then cannot prove they are owed any money so you don't actually have to pay them? That's outrageous!

I was a season ticket holder and I did not get an email.

But a little child wasn't blinded. I don't get your point.

A year for lobbing a hub cap at someone? That's just mental really.

How ridiculous.

Why not just charge a grand each for tickets then we can have even better players!

I think transparency is the key thing lacking. I'm not asking the club to lay its finances bare, but I do think the fans deserve to be told the reason behind things more often.

No one has said otherwise apart from dune.

TDD I can see the thinking of Cortese, I just don't like the way it has been implemented and how fans have been shown so little respect.

The bad bunch being football club administrations/chairmans. It's irrelevent anyway, I could have just as easily have said, SFC may have a better administration in charge than most clubs, but that does not mean that there aren't big areas for improvement. If there is no fans forum then I shall be writing to both the club and the echo to highlight my concerns. I believe a group of fans (including mods on here) met last week to see if something could be sorted out. I am not sure of the conclusions. There is also rumours that Cortese was influenced to backtrack somewhat over sacking Pardew (you will no doubt dismiss this point but whatever.) Having fans be aware of what is going on and expressing displeasure at certain decisions means that the club are less likely to continually try their luck to see what they can get away with. The alternative is just sitting back, doing nothing and accepting whatever the club decides to do and I'm not prepared to do that.

Sorry am not prepared to elaborate on here. There have been rumours of law suits against some fans and the Echo.

Well someone has changed it!

But being the best of a bad bunch does not mean that we should not highlight problems and issues within the administration and that we should not press the club for answers and to improve its relationship with the fans wherever possible.

That's fine TDD but for others that is not the only thing they care about. Rumours of law suits is worrying, as is decisions being made with no explanation IMO. If there is a decision taken which negatively affects you then do you not think the least you deserve is an explanation? I imagine that it wouldn't bother you but you must concede that it bothers a great many saints fans, enough to make it a real problem I would say.

Certainly recent signs are not encouraging Andy.

Who other than Dune on this thread has moaned about the membership?

What a pathetic assumption. If the membership is reasonable and consistent with the cost of past membership schemes then I will have no problem. I don't look for problems for the sake of it, I simply comment on each individual issue.

It is impossible to suggest a reasonable price without any knowledge of what the membership will entitle you to. Not sure why I'm even responding to you.

Agreed. With regards to price I shall wait and see what the club are proposing before passing comment.

djharvey is a mong and clearly retarded.

And if there is not a fans forum? How would your feelings be then?

Shutup djharvey. You can search for the reasons, there are many which have aready been posted.

I am happy for memberships to be introduced. Depends on the price though.