hypochondriac

Unfortunately for him there's nothing he can do or say that can excuse those substitutions.

We need to sack off the failures. That means still to go then play a Ln attacking midfield of Scienza Aribo fellows

Off you fuck still.

Haha. Will still just leave mate you joker.

I suggest you look how much Larry Ellison has given the Tony Blair foundation and how much it has changed since his money arrived.

If we don't win this I think he may have to go tonight.

Who is playing up front now ?

I meant publically. It's obviously part of a big behind the scenes move pushed by Larry Ellison so he can enrich his tech oracle and the rest of his tech empire. Along with the devil himself Blair of course.

Am not sure why that's so amusing @tdmickey3. If it was Elon musk funding this stuff to the degree that Larry Ellison is, it would be global news.

Aribo would be a big upgrade. Absolutely bizarre we ignore him.

If there's no men in the women's loos then there's less likely to be an issue. I don't think people should be confronting people if it isn't obvious what sex they are (although sometimes it is very obvious) but if you hadn't had men trespassing into spaces they shouldn't be then this would have never been an issue.

I can think of no reason why this isn't done immediately.

It was one of our worst performances of the season bettered only by hull for me. It's a miracle we won it.

Depressingly I can see Sheffield United winning today quite handily. If we lose we will likely only be above the on goal difference.

I haven't personally seen us create a shed load of chances. Most of our dangerous play breaks down in the final third. We've had a few chances that have drawn good saves from the keeper but other than the Swansea game I haven't seen a load of glaring misses. I reckon they count chances in an odd way.

Which is why we need to play with a more attacking style.

I genuinely don't understand. If we're conceding a load of goals either way then why not at least go more attacking and try to out score the opposition.

Will still: "it's not about the names or positions" Bollocks. I hate when managers say shit like that.

Starmer pushing hard on digital ID over the last couple of days which has morphed from a system to prove who yo are for work to all manner of other things.

There's been no proposal that I have seen to physically police loos. The principal is no biological men in women's spaces.

Great we agree. No biological men in the women's loos.

Agreed. Seems very odd to me.

Right but there does now appear that there are a number of people invited on this panel who are not grooming gang victims. These people have also confirmed that they were looking to widen the scope of the investigation-a charge that Phillips denied in the commons- which would have the effect of diluting the findings. You're right that some people are politically partisan but that fact is surely not a good way of discovering the truth.

That's what needs to happen here. You will never be a citizen, you will never have leave to remain, you will never receive benefits or aid beyond the very basics. That will reduce the numbers undoubtedly.

Given the counter statement today about jess Phillips, the big question that now needs answering in relation to this issue is who on earth invited loads of victims of individual grooming or wilder child sexual abuse on a panel relating to an inquiry on grooming gangs? Was the purpose to dilute the findings?