Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    44046
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. You got me. I just post on here for a laugh.
  2. 3 at the back and you fucked it up. Why the fuck do we play 3? Why the fuck do we play 3? We want 4 at the back say we want 4 at the back
  3. Is he even a Saints fan?
  4. I'm glad you're amused.
  5. Not wedded to a formation apparently...
  6. Can we get a chant started against three at the back so the club are aware of the strength of feeling about it?
  7. Scienza will be off at 60 with Fellows off for Jelert at half time regardless of how well they play. Bazunu will make numerous mistakes probably at least one quite early. Let's say 17 minutes. I'm not measuring the last one it will be too many.
  8. Isn't it basically the same team that lost pathetically against Oxford? Only difference being Quarshie in.
  9. Correct so far! Five at the back, Fellows and Scienza playing but fellows put of position again, Stephens off for Quarshie and Manning to start. Just need him to perform ineptly defensively which is basically guaranteed at this point.
  10. If you think about it. The point against Middlesbrough, Millwall, Birmingham and Coventry will be decent once we get a point next week.
  11. Place your bets now. Five at the back, Fellows and Scienza continuing not to play together in their best positions, Stephens starting or first sub on with Quarshie swapped in, Manning to start and perform ineptly at the actual job of defending. Wonder how close I'll be.
  12. Saintlee Ascoli Saint sausage (was this crab lungs/ monty's turban?) Redandwhitepanda Rulebook ric Roger berks All sadly missed.
  13. I'm responsible for fire safety at multiple places for a few years now and part of the training involves watching a few of these videos. You can't believe it still goes on and anyone with any training would be questioning things as soon as they walked in the room.
  14. Tonda said he was happy and that it wasn't a poor game of football. Either he believes that which is unbelievable or he's just saying it in the post match interviews which means they aren't valuable in the slightest. I don't believe he's stupid, he must see the difference between performances from a month ago and now. What has changed?
  15. Tonda has such low standards. Today was awful and he never says he's too unhappy. The players must love getting an easy ride. I didn't see how we couldn't have given it to him at the time given how good our form was but sadly it's fallen off a cliff and doesn't look like returning.
  16. I don't believe that he isn't dogmatic about formation.
  17. That was absolute shite. It would help if Tonda diplomatically said the same thing post match but he will instead say it was a good point. No it wasn't it was a shit point and he refuses to change the way we play. Only positive is a clean sheet.
  18. So bored I wasted time
  19. OK. Doesn't discredit my point.
  20. Not under Tonda we haven't and not with Jander, Fellows and Scienza in their best positions.
  21. hypochondriac

    Israel

    I forget what fuckwits we have as fans
  22. We can also play it successfully at times. The issue is when we aren't playing it successfully or we have teams who can play against it easily. What then?
  23. No problem with him playing it when it's a surprise and teams haven't adapted. Once it becomes obvious that we've been found out we need another way of playing. We haven't shown we can do anything other than one thing.
  24. Tonda not dogmatic about formation apparently. Could have fooled me! Has he played anything other than three at the back at any point ?
×
×
  • Create New...