hypochondriac

I'd agree with @Lord Duckhunter if we had a few games trying a new formation to see if we perform much worse. We concede multiple goals most games anyway. Maybe a change of formation will allow us to play to our strengths more and pose even more of a goal threat and out score teams.

Worth continuong to post this before every game until someone gets the message.

The advantage of playing four at the back is that you could have three cms and play one further forward if required.

I'd certainly have him on the bench with the idea that he would displace Azaz if he proves himself to be better.

Imagine having two of the best wingers in the entire league and refusing to play then together in their best positions. We concede multiple goals every other match regardless of how many defenders we play. If we'd played both wingers together as wingers with four at the back and looked worse then fair enough but we haven't and I think it would be hard to look worse at times. I'm annoyed at the manager. He never seems to be particularly upset at what are mostly poor performances. I'd be expecting him to have higher standards. Today wasn't good enough again and I want to hear him say that.

Not rocket science. Mccarthy Jelert THB Wood Wellington Downes/Charles Jander Fellows Azaz Scienza Armstrong

Didn't Tonda say something about Leo not being used to playing lots of 90 minutes? Bizarre that a football player can't manage it after months of training and halfway through the season.

Absolute bollocks. Sorry.

McCarthy Edwards/Jelert THB Woods Wellington Should be the defence and then ASAP in January we should replace one or two of them.

It's because he's made his decision because his distribution is better than McCarthy. Clearly he thinks that ability outweighs other considerations.

Yeah that's fair. I do find it weird that he won't change formation though. If we lined up with four at the back and Fellows in midfield what's the worst that could happen? Maybe we concede a couple of goals? That happens every game regardless!

I get that but I don't think it's hysterical to express some concern that the brief period of good form was the temporary bit and we've just reverted to the norm. In previous games we've had some changes like Fellows or Scienza out but the last game was particularly concerning because we were full strength and were really poor.

Not sure that worked in the last game given we were shit in both halves!

No it doesn't, particularly because he didn't even play an hour in the last game. Even if what you say is true, start him and give him an hour. If he's fit for the bench he needs to play.

If plan A doesn't work the only thing to do is to do plan A again but with your best player dropped.

Sigh. Five at the back again with the only change being our best player on the bench. I've got no confidence we are going to fundamentally change anything.

I thin kwe have a problem. The manager has done what we all feared which is an upturn in performance but no idea what to do and not enough experience to change things when plan A doesn't work.

I'm not sure he's meant to be a likable character.

Fraser is great. Never found Friends funny though I'm afraid.

Not sure about that. I'm Alan partridge had a laughter track and it's hilarious.

Fair enough I don't know. It's certainly reduced their ability to make a profit in the future.

Friends is one of those largely unfunny American shows that is just something you stick on in the background whilst doing something else. Like the Big Bang Theory or Two and a half men which is also very unfunny but wildly popular in America in particular.

Genuinely asking as I don't know the details but my understanding was that this new act encourages tenants to challenge every single rent increase and it then gets frozen at the original rate whilst they appeal which could last a long time. On appeal the rate can never go up only down or stay at the new proposed rate. That's going to make it pretty difficult for landlords who even want to put up prices at a reasonable rate to keep up with inflation for example.

Customs Union without EU membership makes no sense at all.

People mostly like Bob Dylan because he was all political. Lots of his songs were covered better by other artists anyway.